Artery Research

Volume 5, Issue 4, December 2011, Pages 181 - 181

P7.09 PULSE WAVE ANALYSIS REVEALS THAT MYOCARDIAL ISCHAEMIA IS NOT LIKELY TO EXPLAIN THE ‘J-CURVE’ ASSOCIATION BETWEEN DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE AND MORTALITY

Authors
M.G. Schultz1, W.P. Abhayaratna2, J.E. Sharman1
1Menzies Research Institute Tasmania, University of Tasmania., Hobart, Australia
2Australia National University, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia
Available Online 29 November 2011.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.116How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Background: There is a well-established ‘J-curve’ relationship between brachial DBP and mortality. A purported, although unconfirmed mechanism for the “J-curve” is reduced myocardial perfusion due to low DBP. However, we hypothesised this would be unlikely because DBP may be a poor marker of myocardial perfusion. This study aimed to determine the relationship between DBP and subendocardial perfusion in patients with and without coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods: 134 patients with CAD (aged 76±7 years; 69% male) and 134 matched healthy controls (HC) (aged 77±2 years; 69% male) underwent measurement of brachial DBP and radial tonometry to derive subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR), a marker of subendocardial perfusion. These measures were additionally undertaken in 47 patients (aged 63±10 years) at baseline and during peak dobutamine stress echocardiography in presence or absence of myocardial ischaemia.

Results: There was no difference in DBP or SEVR between HC and CAD patients (P>0.05), nor was there a difference in SEVR across quartiles of DBP in CAD (P=0.07) or HC (P=0.14) patients. Associations between DBP and SEVR in HC (r=0.185, P=0.03) and CAD patients (r=0.204, P=0.02) were non significant after adjustment for age and height (p=0.07 and p=0.11, respectively). At peak dobutamine stress, SEVR was significantly reduced in patients with ischaemia versus those without inducible ischaemia (84±17 vs. 101±22 mmHg.s.min−1, P=0.01). However, DBP was not significantly different (65±14 vs. 67±15 mmHg, P=0.32).

Conclusion: Brachial DBP is a poor marker of subendocardial perfusion, suggesting the ‘J-curve’ relationship between DBP and mortality is unlikely attributable to reduced myocardial perfusion.

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
5 - 4
Pages
181 - 181
Publication Date
2011/11/29
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.116How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - M.G. Schultz
AU  - W.P. Abhayaratna
AU  - J.E. Sharman
PY  - 2011
DA  - 2011/11/29
TI  - P7.09 PULSE WAVE ANALYSIS REVEALS THAT MYOCARDIAL ISCHAEMIA IS NOT LIKELY TO EXPLAIN THE ‘J-CURVE’ ASSOCIATION BETWEEN DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE AND MORTALITY
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 181
EP  - 181
VL  - 5
IS  - 4
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.116
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2011.10.116
ID  - Schultz2011
ER  -