Artery Research

Volume 2, Issue 3, August 2008, Pages 101 - 101

P1.38 CONVERSION BETWEEN DEFINITIONS OF PULSE WAVE VELOCITY

Authors
S.J. Vermeersch1, E. Rietzschel2, T.C. Gillebert2, S. Laurent3, P. Boutouyrie3, P. Segers1
1IBiTech, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
2Dept. Cardiovascular Diseases, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
3Université Paris-Descartes, Faculté de Médecine Paris Descartes, INSERM UMRS872, APHP - HEGP, Dept. Pharmacology, Paris, France
Available Online 15 September 2008.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2008.08.345How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Background: Different methodologies for determination of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) exist. Distance (L) can be measured from carotid-femoral measurement sites (Ldirect) or obtained by subtracting carotid-sternum from sternum-femoral distances (Lsubtracted). Transit times are usually obtained either by detection of the maximal upstroke (Δtmaximal upstroke) or the foot (Δtintersecting tangent) of the waveform at the measurement sites. This study investigates conversion factors between PWV methodologies.

Methods: 3043 subjects in which both distance measurements were available were divided into model and validation groups (1502/1541 subjects, respectively). In the model population the main determinants of the ratiodistance = Lsubtracted/Ldirect were determined and a multivariate model was constructed. Estimated ratiodistance,est was used to convert from PWVdirect to PWVsubtracted,est in the validation population. PWVsubtracted,est was compared to measured PWVsubtracted. Ninety three subjects in which both transit times were available were divided into model and validation groups (46/47 subjects, respectively). In the model population a model for estimation of Δtmaximal upstroke,est from Δtintersecting tangent was constructed and used to estimate Δtmaximal upstroke,est in the validation population. Δtmaximal upstroke,est was compared to measured Δtmaximal upstroke. Data are presented as mean(stdev).

Results: The main determinants of ratiodistance were age (R2=0.17) and BMI (R2=0.15) (combined: R2=0.27, all P<0.001). PWVsubtracted,est correlated well with PWVsubtracted (R=0.97, P<0.001) with mean difference of 0.0007 (0.40) m/s. Δtmaximal upstroke,est correlated well with Δtmaximal upstroke,est (R=0.82, P<0.001) and mean difference of 0.58 (1.03) m/s.

Conclusions: Differences in absolute PWV values are important to compensate for in order to compare between studies. The models proposed allow for such conversion.

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
2 - 3
Pages
101 - 101
Publication Date
2008/09/15
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2008.08.345How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - S.J. Vermeersch
AU  - E. Rietzschel
AU  - T.C. Gillebert
AU  - S. Laurent
AU  - P. Boutouyrie
AU  - P. Segers
PY  - 2008
DA  - 2008/09/15
TI  - P1.38 CONVERSION BETWEEN DEFINITIONS OF PULSE WAVE VELOCITY
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 101
EP  - 101
VL  - 2
IS  - 3
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2008.08.345
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2008.08.345
ID  - Vermeersch2008
ER  -