Artery Research

Volume 8, Issue 4, December 2014, Pages 167 - 167

PO-03 SEX DIFFERENCES IN STIFFNESS PARAMETERS FOLLOWING MAXIMAL EXERCISE

Authors
R.M. Kappusa, S.M. Ranadiveb, H. Yanc, A.D. Laned, J.A. Woodse, K.R. Wilunde, B. Fernhalla
aUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
bMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
cEast Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
dUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
eUniversity of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
Available Online 4 November 2014.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2014.09.009How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Objectives: The sex differences found in cardiovascular disease risk and progression are well established. These discrepancies are potentially attributed to the cardioprotective effect of estrogen or sex specific differences in fitness. There may also be sex differences in the cardiovascular responses to exercise, which could underlie this disease risk. We investigated arterial stiffness parameters at rest and following maximal exercise in untrained males and females.

Methods: Eighty-three young (mean age=25 years), healthy males (n= 39) and females (n=44) underwent measures of vascular stiffness at rest and both 15 and 30 minutes (po15, po30) following maximal exercise. The exercise stimulus was an acute progressive maximal exercise bout on a cycle ergometer.

Results: Females had significantly lower pressures (carotid, aortic and brachial) at all time points compared to males, with no heart rate differences. Arterial compliance (AC) and Elastic Modulus (Ep) changed similarly between sexes, with a decreased compliance at po15, returning to baseline values at po30. Males had significantly elevated central stiffness (cPWV) at both rest and po15 compared to females, but significantly decreased at po30 to match values of the females. The significance in cPWV between sexes remained after controlling for aortic MAP.

Conclusions: Females have a less stiff resting arterial profile compared to males. However, with maximal exercise, males altered their arterial profile to eliminate any significant differences between females in stiffness indices. This suggests that a maximal bout of exercise is an appropriate stimulus for evaluating stress induced sex differences in arterial stiffness.

Total (n=83) Males (n=39) Females (n=44)
Age (yr) 25.3 ± 0.8 25.2 ± 1.5 24.9± 0.7
BMI (kg/m2) 27.2 ± 0.8 26.7 ± 0.7 27.6 ± 1.3
Height (cm) * 170.2 ± 1.1 178.2 ± 0.9 163.2 ± 1.
Weight (kg) * 79.1 ± 2.4 84.9 ± 2.4 74.1 ± 4.0
VO2peak (ml/kg/min) * 33.1 ± 0.9 38.4 ± 1.3 28.3 ± 0.9
PO-03. Table 1

Descriptive statistics.

Males Females


Rest Post15 Post30 Rest Post15 Post30
bMAP (mmHg) 90±1* 92±2* 89±1* # 85±1 84±2 84±1
aorMAP (mmHg) 87±1* 90±2* 88±1* 84±1 82±1 82±1
HR (bpm) 63±2 86±2 $ 79±2 $# 65±1 83±2 $ 78±2 $#
cPWV (m/s) 6.12±0.17* 6.21±0.15*$ 5.84±0.17$ 5.50±0.16 5.34±0.14 5.56±0.15
Ep (kPa) 72.51±3.42* 81.09±4.52 71.51±3.93 61.33±3.12 71.41±4.13$ 66.14±3.49
AC (mm2/kPa) 1.14±0.07* 0.97±0.07$ 1.12±0.06# 1.31±0.06 1.10±0.06$ 1.22±0.06#
B-Stiffness 5.81±0.27 6.23±0.33 5.71±0.32 5.24±0.24 6.10±0.30$ 5.71±0.29
*

p<0.05 between sexes.

$

sig diff from rest.

#

sig diff from po15.

PO-03. Table 2

Pressure and stiffness response before and following maximal exercise.

Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
8 - 4
Pages
167 - 167
Publication Date
2014/11/04
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2014.09.009How to use a DOI?
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - R.M. Kappus
AU  - S.M. Ranadive
AU  - H. Yan
AU  - A.D. Lane
AU  - J.A. Woods
AU  - K.R. Wilund
AU  - B. Fernhall
PY  - 2014
DA  - 2014/11/04
TI  - PO-03 SEX DIFFERENCES IN STIFFNESS PARAMETERS FOLLOWING MAXIMAL EXERCISE
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 167
EP  - 167
VL  - 8
IS  - 4
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2014.09.009
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2014.09.009
ID  - Kappus2014
ER  -