Proceedings of the 1st Aceh International Dental Meeting (AIDEM 2019), Oral Health International Conference On Art, Nature And Material Science Development 2019

The Difference of One-Third Apical Root Canal Cleanliness After Instrumentation Between Single File System and Multiple File With Continuous Rotation Motion

Authors
Cahyani, W Hadriyanto, Dayinah
Corresponding Author
Cahyani
Available Online 1 February 2021.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2991/ahsr.k.210201.003How to use a DOI?
Keywords
Single file, Multiple File, SEM, Root Canal Cleanliness
Abstract

Cleanliness of a root canal treatment is measured by the level of cleanliness of the root canal covering the apical third, middle third, and coronal third. The area that is most difficult to clear by the instrument file is the apical third root canal wall because it has a complex root canal shape, there is ramification, is narrower, curved, and often has a root canal branching, the microorganisms that develop in the apical third region. single file and multiple file system rotating instruments have their own advantages and disadvantages depending on the design of the file of a device. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of single file and multiple file system with continuous rotation motion on the cleanliness of apical third root canal after instrumentation. Twelve freshly extracted mandibular premolar were used for the study. The specimens were randomly devided into two groups. Group I single file system prepared using a One Curve, group II multipleple file system prepared using ProTaper Next with the crown down technique. All research subjects were cut longitudinally, then coating platina. Observation of the level of cleanliness of the root canal was carried out using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) with magnification of 2000 and 5000 times at 1/3 apical. The results of micrographic photographs (SEM) are then given a score of 1-4 based on the dentinal tubules which are not covered by the preparation material. Mann-Whitney U test results are at p values 0.036 (p <0.05). The lowest Mean Rank value is in the Protaper Next group. In this study, it was concluded that the cleanliness of one-third root canals after preparation using a multiple-file instrument was better than one file system.

Copyright
© 2021, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 1st Aceh International Dental Meeting (AIDEM 2019), Oral Health International Conference On Art, Nature And Material Science Development 2019
Series
Advances in Health Sciences Research
Publication Date
1 February 2021
ISBN
978-94-6239-323-3
ISSN
2468-5739
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2991/ahsr.k.210201.003How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2021, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Cite this article

TY  - CONF
AU  - Cahyani
AU  - W Hadriyanto
AU  - Dayinah
PY  - 2021
DA  - 2021/02/01
TI  - The Difference of One-Third Apical Root Canal Cleanliness After Instrumentation Between Single File System and Multiple File With Continuous Rotation Motion
BT  - Proceedings of the 1st Aceh International Dental Meeting (AIDEM 2019), Oral Health International Conference On Art, Nature And Material Science Development 2019
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 11
EP  - 16
SN  - 2468-5739
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/ahsr.k.210201.003
DO  - https://doi.org/10.2991/ahsr.k.210201.003
ID  - 2021
ER  -