Artery Research

Volume 16, Issue C, December 2016, Pages 11 - 17

Concomitance of atherosclerotic lesions in arteries of the lower extremities and carotid arteries in patients with abdominal aorta aneurysm

Authors
Piotr Kaźmierskia, *, Michał Pająka, Katarzyna Bogusiakb
aDepartment of Vascular, General and Oncological Surgery, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Lodz, Poland
bCraniomaxillofacial and Oncological Surgery Ward, University Teaching Hospital No 1 in Lodz, Kopcińskiego 22, 90-153 Lodz, Poland
*Corresponding author. Kolarska 87, 94-125 Łódź, Poland. Fax: +48 42 689 52 42. E-mail address: ave151@wp.pl (P. Kaźmierski).
Corresponding Author
Piotr Kaźmierski
Received 23 March 2016, Revised 5 August 2016, Accepted 15 August 2016, Available Online 19 September 2016.
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2016.08.003How to use a DOI?
Keywords
Abdominal aorta aneurysm; Atherosclerosis; Carotid arteries stenosis
Abstract

Atherosclerosis was considered the main cause of abdominal aorta aneurysms. Many researchers suggest the presence of the association between these two entities. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the presence of atherosclerosis in the aorta and the arteries of the lower extremities, as well as stenoses and occlusions of carotid arteries in patients with abdominal aorta aneurysm.

One-hundred and eighty patients with abdominal aorta aneurysm (23 women and 157 men), aged 50–86 years old (mean 67.28 ± 9.95) were qualified for the study. Each patient had ultrasound of abdominal aorta, arteries of the lower extremities and extracranial carotid arteries. The patients were divided into two groups: A – isolated abdominal aorta aneurysm (AAA-92 patients), B – AAA with atherosclerotic lesions in the abdominal aorta and/or the arteries of the lower extremities (88 patients), in which four different localizations of atherosclerotic lesions were distinguished.

The statistically significant differences between the groups were observed in the prevalence of carotid arteries stenosis (CCA + ICA). No correlation was found between the aneurysm diameter and the stenosis grade of the extracranial segments of the carotid arteries.

The presented results confirm the common occurrence of atherosclerotic lesions in aorta and/or arteries of the lower extremities and carotid arteries in patients with abdominal aorta aneurysm, yet their etiology is different. Such patients represent a heterogeneous group in respect to the presence of carotid arteries stenoses.

Copyright
© 2016 Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Introduction

Atherosclerosis was for many years considered the main cause for the formation of abdominal aorta aneurysms.1 According to the theory, which prevailed until recently, the basic role in the pathological aortic dilatation was attributed to the aging of the blood vessels. Such assumption was supported by clinical observation of patients with chronic aortic diseases and the examinations of pathologically changed vessels’ segments. The stiffness of atherosclerotic aorta and processes taking place in its wall were to play the fundamental role in its degeneration and strength reduction. One of the rationales for such observation was the common presence of atherosclerotic plaques in the intima of the aortic aneurysm. Their formation and evolution were considered to influence the natural course of the aneurysm leading to the weakening of the wall and raising the risk of rupture.2 An association between the raised elastase activity and elastin degradation and the severity of atherosclerotic plaque formation was suggested.3,4 The above mentioned phenomena led to the development of the atherosclerotic theory of abdominal aorta aneurysm formation.5,6 The studies carried out in the recent years did not, however, confirm the previous theory of atherosclerotic-based formation of AAA, indicating the morphological and immunological dissimilarities of both pathologies.7,8 The identification of the gene responsible for the hereditary form of AAA, being one of the most important finding of modern medicine in the recent years, seems to confirm such thesis.9,10

Aim

The aim of this paper was to evaluate the presence of atherosclerotic lesions in the aorta and/or the arteries of the lower extremities, as well as stenoses and/or occlusions of carotid arteries in patients with abdominal aorta aneurysm.

Methods

The study was carried out in the Department of Vascular, General and Oncological Surgery, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Lodz, Poland. One-hundred and eighty patients with abdominal aorta aneurysm (23 women and 157 men), aged 50–86 years old (mean 67.28 ± 9.95) were qualified for the study. Each patient had a color Doppler ultrasound of the abdominal aorta, the arteries of the lower extremities and extracranial carotid arteries performed. At the time of the study almost every patient with AAA + AS (84 out of 88) received best medical treatment for this condition (ASA + statin), whereas only approx. 50% of the patients with AAA only received ASA.

The patients were divided into two groups according to the ultrasound findings and observed flow disturbances:

  • GROUP A (AAA) –

    isolated abdominal aorta aneurysm, 92 patients, including 14 women (15.2%) and 78 men (84.8%), mean age 67.43;

  • GROUP B (AAA + AS) –

    the presence of atherosclerotic lesions in the abdominal aorta or the arteries of the lower extremities concomitant to AAA, 88 patients, including 9 women (10.2%) and 79 men (89.8%), mean age 67.13.

The extracranial segments of both carotid arteries (CCA + ICA) were assessed in each patient using 2-D presentation. The flow velocities were measured and spectral analysis (duplex Doppler) and color flow imaging were performed as well. The quantitative evaluation of atherosclerotic lesions in the assessed carotid arteries segments (CCA + ICA stenoses) was performed according to the NASCET guidelines, including the analysis of the alterations in flow spectrum as well, to confirm the stenosis grade. Once each stenosis was automatically calculated, each artery was assigned to one of the following groups:

  • a –

    no atherosclerotic lesions (0%),

  • b –

    low-grade stenosis (1–29%),

  • c –

    medium-grade stenosis, hemodynamically insignificant (30–49%),

  • d –

    medium-grade stenosis, hemodynamically significant (50–69%),

  • e –

    high-grade stenosis (70–99%),

  • f –

    artery occlusion (100%).

Statistics

The obtained results were subjected to statistical analysis using Excel and Statgraphics Plus v. 5.0 software. The patients’ structure estimated according to the observed features was determined using percentages. The studied group of patients was described using stratum weights for the qualitative features. For quantitative features the arithmetic mean (Xm) was calculated as an average value and measure of dispersion – standard deviation (SD) and minimal and maximal values were presented. Test for two means was used to compare the calculated arithmetic means: a) for large sample size (n1, n2 > 30), b) for small sample size (n1, n2 < 30). The difference between studied parameters was considered statistically significant (incidences, arithmetic means), when the calculated test value was equal or greater than the critical value obtained from chi-square tables (normal, t-Student) with appropriate number of degrees of freedom and error probability of less than 0.05.

Results

Table 1 presents general description of both analyzed groups and the distribution of risk factors. The A group was characterized by statistically significant higher mean diameter of AAA than group B (p < 0.001). The prevalence of carotid lesions, smoking and ischemic heart disease was significantly more frequent in patients from group B.

Group characteristics Total A (AAA) B (AAA + AS) A vs B

Statistical analysis p value
Mean age 67.28 ± 9.95 67.43 ± 10.2 67.13 ± 10.3 0.202 0.840
Mean diameter of AAA 42.47 ± 11.6 45.79 ± 14.27 39.14 ± 8.90 3.769 0.0002






N % N % N %







Sample size 180 100 92 88
Sex
  Men 157 87.2 78 84.8 79 89.8 1.005 0.316
  Women 23 12.8 14 15.2 9 10.2
Presence of carotid lesion 114 63.3 46 50.0 68 77.2 14.418 0.0001
Smoking 113 62.8 40 43.5 73 83.0 21.8 0.00001
Hypertension 55 30.6 26 28.3 29 33.0 0.468 0.494
Hyperlipidemia 13 7.2 4 4.3 9 10.2 2.317 0.128
Diabetes 10 5.6 6 6.5 4 4.5 0.064 0.800
Ischemic heart disease 25 13.9 8 8.7 17 19.3 4.261 0.0390
Stroke or TIA 3 1.7 2 2.2 1 1.1 0.002 0.969
Previous vascular surgery due to atherosclerosis 2 1.1 4 4.3 6 6.8 0.158 0.691

A – isolated abdominal aorta aneurysm (AAA), B – the presence of atherosclerotic lesions in the abdominal aorta or arteries of the lower extremities concomitant to AAA (AAA + AS).

TIA – transient ischemic attack.

The numbers in bold indicate statistically significant differences.

Table 1.

Analyzed groups characteristics.

Figure 1 presents the distribution of atherosclerotic lesions in the carotid arteries among the patients of group A and B. The percentage rate of over 50% carotid artery stenoses (d and e) was 10.55%, i.e. 19 patients (d – 6.67%, i.e. 12 patients, and e – 3.89%, i.e. 7 patients). The carotid artery occlusion (f) was observed in 11 patients (6.11%) and its incidence was similar in both groups: i.e. 6 patients in group A (6.52%) and 5 patients in group B (5.68%).

Figure 1.

Distribution of atherosclerotic lesions in carotid arteries in particular groups, including stenosis grade. A – isolated abdominal aorta aneurysm (AAA), B – the presence of atherosclerotic lesions in the abdominal aorta or arteries of the lower extremities concomitant to AAA (AAA + AS). a – no atherosclerotic lesions (0%), b – low-grade stenosis (1–29%), c – medium-grade stenosis hemodynamically insignificant (30–49%), d – medium-grade stenosis hemodynamically significant (50–69%), e − high-grade stenosis (70–99%),f – artery occlusion (100%). The difference between the groups, as a whole, is statistically significant.

The difference in the distribution of carotid atherosclerotic lesions was statistically significant (p < 0.05) between groups A and B as a whole.

Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups A and B were observed for carotid stenoses 50–69% (d), cumulated non-occlusive stenoses over 50% (d + e) and such stenoses combined with occlusion group (d + e + f).

No statistically significant association was observed between the aneurysm diameter and carotid artery stenosis both for isolated aneurysm, and for AAA concomitant with atherosclerosis of aorta and/or arteries of the lower extremities (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Aneurysm diameter (mm) and carotid lesions in groups. O – total, A – isolated abdominal aorta aneurysm (AAA), B – the presence of atherosclerotic lesions in the abdominal aorta or arteries of the lower extremities concomitant to AAA (AAA + AS). a – no atherosclerotic lesions (0%), b – low-grade stenosis (1–29%), c – medium-grade stenosis hemodynamically insignificant (30–49%), d – medium-grade stenosis hemodynamically significant (50–69%), e − high-grade stenosis (70–99%), f – artery occlusion (100%). The difference between the groups, as a whole, is not statistically significant.

Discussion

Until recently atherosclerosis was considered the primary cause for the formation of abdominal aorta aneurysms.1 Commonly observed atherosclerotic plaques in the intima of aneurysmatic aorta and processes associated with their formation and evolution, such as rupture and dissection secondary to the hemorrhagic conversion may influence the natural course of aneurysm, resulting in the reduction of wall strength and raise in the risk of aneurysm rupture. One of the main phenomenon taking place during blood vessel aging is the degradation of elastic fibers, which intensifies in such conditions as atherosclerosis, arterial hypertension and diabetes.3,4 Some studies indicated the high elastase activity in human aorta extracts, which increased exponentially with age and correlated with the severity of atherosclerotic lesions. The impairment of elastin/laminin receptor function and its permanent stimulation (e.g. during aging) was proven responsible for the overproduction of elastases and elastin degradation.4 The positive correlation between the concentration of elastin degradation products and aneurysm growth rate was found.5,6 The atherosclerosis-like process that was previously considered responsible for pathological aorta dilatation was not confirmed in recent studies. Although numerous studies concerning the processes of vascular damage revealed many common features between atherosclerosis and aortic aneurysm, the detailed analyses proved that they are generally different pathological phenomena, showing their morphological and immunological dissimilarities.7,8 The proliferation of arterial intima is the dominating element in the pathology of atherosclerosis, whereas the weakening of media and adventitia contribute to the reduction in elasticity and tensile strength of the aorta. It results in the reduction of wall thickness, increase in wall tension, dilation of aortic lumen, which may eventually lead to aortic rupture. The discovery of these phenomena and processes, which contribute to the pathological aortic dilation led to common recognition of multifactorial aneurysm etiology.

One of the main issues concerning aneurysm etiology is pathological processes taking place in its wall and concomitance of various systemic diseases. The etiological factors that accompany aortic aneurysms include: degenerative diseases, congenital developmental defects, smoking, infections, vasculities and trauma. The significant factors determining the formation of aortic aneurysm include: inflammation, proteolytic connective tissue degradation and biomechanical factors, that alter the quality and structure of aortic wall and consequently contribute to the reduction of aortic resistance to forces associated with pulsatile blood flow.11 It is favored by factors associated with wall structure itself, characteristic of blood flow and reduction of perfusion in abdominal aortic wall supplied by supplying vessels.1214

Commonly recognized pathological phenomenon is the presence of atherosclerotic lesions in patients with abdominal aorta aneurysm in the aorta itself, and the arteries of the lower extremities, carotid arteries and coronary arteries as well.1523 Frequent incidence of these two pathologies was confirmed both in clinical observation, and autopsy as well, especially among older men.15,24,25 Their correlation is being discussed for years and several theories were developed, aiming at explaining the mutual influence of these pathological phenomena.26

The first theory of atherosclerosis-based aneurysm etiology led to the development of the term “atherosclerotic aneurysm” that is present in medicine for over 100 years and is still being used by some researchers.2628 It assumes the presence of causal relationship between atherosclerotic degeneration of aortic wall and the formation of aneurysmatic dilation of its lumen. It is based on the known and well-described in the literature phenomenon of compensatory dilation of arterial lumen resulting from its wall remodeling in response to shear stress, should the lesion leading primary to stenosis of the vessel lumen, such as atherosclerosis, occur.29 The degradation of intracellular matrix proteins and proteolytic elastin damage may result from chronic inflammatory process secondary to atherosclerosis and concomitant arterial thrombosis.22,29 As far as the remodeling may explain the marked reduction of media thickness, it has no significant influence on adventitia inflammation observed in aneurysmatic aorta. Should aneurysm have causative atherosclerotic background, the atherosclerotic lesions should be present in aortic or arterial wall of all patients. It is contradicted by published papers, which authors indicate various incidence of both pathologies in patients, yet they never reach 100% in AAA-patients.30

The second theory presumes the independent occurrence of both aortic pathologies, yet common contribution of some genetic and environmental risk factors, whereas the type of the lesion being developed is associated with different pathophysiological mechanism.21 It is supported by the observation of many similarities in pathogenesis and pathophysiology of both diseases.3134 The opponents of this theory indicate obvious differences among risk factors characteristic in patients with atherosclerosis developing in carotid, coronary and lower extremities arteries and patients with aortic aneurysm.3538 The significant difference in the incidence of diabetes was found in both groups, which is negative or neutral risk factor for AAA, but positive for atherosclerosis.22 Other authors indicate different genetic factors that may be responsible for each of the mentioned vascular pathologies.39 They supported their hypothesis by identifying the gene that is responsible for hereditary aortic aneurysm.10

The third possibility to explain the association between atherosclerosis and aortic aneurysm is their mutual stimulatory interaction, regardless of the fact which pathology occurs first.26 Remodeling occurrence in patients with the primary atherosclerosis of aortic wall and being a result of flow disturbances in the atherosclerotic abdominal aorta, interaction with oxidized LDL and the release of proinflammatory cytokines from mural thrombi leads to the secondary proteolysis and degradation of intracellular matrix and inflammation that may lead to wall weakening and aneurysmatic dilation of aortic lumen.

The presence of thrombi in the aneurysmal sac that contains high concentration of proteolytic enzymes and plasminogen activators contributes to the injury of the aortic wall, which leads to the aneurysm growth and rupture.4042 On the other hand however, their presence hampers oxygen perfusion to the aortic wall, which increases vessel stiffness, reduces its compliance and ability to adapt to blood pressure changes, which in turn contributes to the formation of atherosclerotic plaques should certain environmental factors interact.43,44

The Norwegian TROMSO Study that included 6,500 adults from general population attempted to determine the relationship between the atherosclerosis of carotid, femoral and coronary arteries and the aortic aneurysm diameter.30 The results excluded the existence of such relationship, whereas the authors suggested that there are no data that could confirm the causative relationship between atherosclerosis and AAA. They suggested that atherosclerotic lesions develop in the aortic wall parallel to its aneurysmal dilation or are secondary to AAA. The SMART study, determining the thickness of intima-media complex in the common carotid artery in various patient groups revealed significant differences between patients with peripheral atherosclerosis and patients with AAA. Therefore the authors concluded that the development of aneurysmal dilation of abdominal aorta, may not simply be explained by atherosclerotic pathology of vessel wall and is determined by other pathophysiologic mechanism.45 There is insufficient evidence to confirm that AAAs are the result of atherosclerosis.46

A positive correlation was found between both the incidence and the grade of carotid artery stenosis and the presence of chronic lesions in aorta and/or arteries of the lower extremities, although it differed in both groups. The percentage of patients with atherosclerotic lesions in carotid arteries was relatively lower (50.0) in patients with isolated abdominal aorta aneurysm and the incidence of over-50% stenoses did not exceed 5%. The significantly higher rate of carotid lesions (77.27%) and higher grade of carotid artery stenosis (17.04% stenoses over 50%) was observed in patients with AAA concomitant to atherosclerotic lesions in peripheral arteries.

The routine evaluation of extracranial segments of carotid arteries during the duplex Doppler examination of aorta and the arteries of the lower extremities in patients with chronic peripheral vascular diseases, regardless of diagnostic or therapeutic indications, may pose a valuable screening tool. The presented comparisons between study groups may allow to identify patients, in which the screening for carotid disease may be most justified and show greatest cost-effectiveness ratio. The statistical analysis revealed significant differences (p < 0.001) in the distribution of carotid artery lesions between the patients with isolated AAA and patients with AAA concomitant to atherosclerotic lesions in aorta and/or arteries of the lower extremities.

The above-mentioned observations may confirm the theory of differing etiology of atherosclerosis and abdominal aorta aneurysm, and their independent incidence. The lack of statistical significance in the difference between the diameter of abdominal aorta aneurysm and the carotid artery stenosis that was observed both for isolated aneurysm, as well as for aneurysm concomitant to atherosclerosis of aorta and/or arteries of the lower extremities seems to additionally confirm such conclusion.

Conclusions

The presented results confirm the common occurrence of atherosclerotic lesions in aorta and/or arteries of the lower extremities and carotid arteries in patients with abdominal aorta aneurysm, yet their etiology is different. Such patients represent a heterogeneous group in respect to the presence of carotid arteries stenoses.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

1.MA Creager, JL Halperin, and AD Whittemore, Aneurysmal disease of the aorta and its branches, VJ Dzau (editor), Vascular medicine: a textbook of vascular biology and diseases, Little, Brown and Company, Boston, 1996, pp. 901.
2.JA Harris, G Kostaki, and JL Glover, Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers of the aorta, J Vasc Surg, Vol. 19, 1994, pp. 90.
5.JS Lindholt, L Heickendorf, EW Henneberg, and HL Fasting, Serum-elastin-peptides as a predictor of small abdominal aortic aneurysms, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, Vol. 14, 1997, pp. 12.
7.WD McMillan, BK Patterson, RR Keen, and WH Pearce, In situ localization and quantification of seventy-two-kilodalton type IV collagenase in aneurismal, occlusive, and normal aorta, J Vasc Surg, Vol. 22, 1995, pp. 295.
8.JM Reilly, GA Sicard, and CL Lucore, Abdominal expression of plasminogen activators in aortic aneurysmal and occlusive disease, J Vasc Surg, Vol. 19, 1994, pp. 865.
10.J Golledge and H Kuivaniemi, Genetic of abdominal aortic aneurysm, Curr Opin Cardiol, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2013, pp. 290-296.
11.M Wassef, BT Baxtr, RL Chisholm, RL Dalman, MF Fillinger, J Heinecke, et al., Pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a multidisciplinary research program supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, J Vasc Surg, Vol. 34, 2001, pp. 730.
13.HD Benjamin and AB Becker, Etiologic incidence of thoracic and abdominal aneurysms, Surg Gynecol Obstet, Vol. 125, 1967, pp. 1307.
14.JE Moore Jr., DN Ku, CK Zarins, and S Glagov, Pulsatile flow visualization in the abdominal aorta under differing physiologic conditions: implications for increased susceptibility to atherosclerosis, J Biochem Eng, Vol. 114, 1992, pp. 391.
17.G Giugliano, E Laurenzano, C Rerngo, G De Rosa, L Brevetti, A Sannino, et al., Abdominal aortic aneurysym in patients affected by intermittent claudication: prevalence and clinical predictors, BMC Surg, Vol. 12, No. Suppl. 1, 2012, pp. S17. [Epub 2012 Nov 15]
18.O Varenne, E Touze, JP Collet, F Raoux, C Boissier, PH Carpentier, et al., Screening strategies for the diagnosis of asymptomatic arterial lesions in patients with atherothrombosis, Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss, Vol. 98, Oct 2005, pp. 5-14. Spec No 4
20.DA Axelrod, A Diwan, JC Stanley, LA Jacobs, PK Henke, LJ Greenfield, et al., Cost of routine screening for carotid and lower extremity occlusive disease in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms, J Vasc Surg, Vol. 35, No. 4, Apr 2002, pp. 754-8.
21.T Pasierski, W Kostewicz, J Rosłon, and P Paczwa, Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysym and peripheral arteria diseases in ambulatory patients with coronary disease, Pol Arch Med Wewn, Vol. 111, No. 2, Feb 2004, pp. 199-203.
23.J Cornuz, C Sidoti pinto, H Tevaerai, and M Egger, Risk factors for asympromatic abdominal aortic aneurysm: systemic review and meta-analysis of population-based screening studies, Eur J Public Health, Vol. 14, 2004, pp. 343-9.
27.B Eiseman and RH Hughes, Repair of an abdominal aortic vena cava fistula caused by rupture of an atherosclerotic aneurysm, Surgery, Vol. 39, 1956, pp. 498-504.
28.E Kaschina, H Scholz, UM Steckelings, M Sommerfeld, UR Kemnitz, M Artuc, et al., Transition from atherosclerosis to aortic aneurysm in human coincides with an increased expression of RAS components, Atherosclerosis, Vol. 205, 2009, pp. 396-403.
34.D Bruemmer, AR Collins, G Noh, W Wang, M Territo, S Arias-Magallona, et al., Angiotensin II-accelerated atherosclerosis and aneurysm formation is attenuated in osteopontin-deficient mice, J Clin Invest, Vol. 112, 2003, pp. 1318-31.
35.A Palazzuoli, M Gallotta, G Guerrieri, I Quatrini, B Franci, MS Campagna, et al., Prevalence of risk factors, coronary and systemic atherosclerosis n abdominal aortic aneurysm: comparison with high cardiovascular risk population, Vasc Health Risk Manag, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2008, pp. 877-83.
38.J Golledge, B Cullen, C Rush, CS Moran, E Secomb, F Wood, et al., Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ligands reduce aortic dilatation in a mouse model of aortic aneurysm, Atherosclerosis, Vol. 210, No. 1, 2010, pp. 51-6.
39.J Golledge, E Biros, M Cooper, N Warrington, LJ Palmer, and PE Norman, Apolipoprotein E genotype is associated with serum C-reactive protein but not abdominal aortic aneurysm, Atherosclerosis, Vol. 209, No. 2, 2010, pp. 487-91.
40.DH Wang, MS Makaroun, MW Webster, and DA Vorp, Effect of intraluminal thrombus on wall stress in patient-specific models of abdominal aortic aneurysym, J Vasc Surg, Vol. 36, 2002, pp. 598.
41.MJ Thubrikar, F Robicsek, M Labrosse, V Chervenkoff, and BL Fowler, Effect of thrombus on abdominal aortic aneurysm wall dilation and stress, J Cardio Vasc Surg (Torino), Vol. 44, 2003, pp. 67.
42.V Fontaine, MP Jacob, X Houard, P Rossignol, D Plissonnier, E Angles-Cano, et al., Involvement of the mural thrombus as a site of protease release and activation in human aortic aneurysms, Am J Pathol, Vol. 161, 2002, pp. 1701.
44.C Strefandis, C Vlachopoulos, P Karayannacos, H Boudoulas, C Stratos, T Filippides, et al., Effect of vasa vasorum flow on structure and function of the aorta in experimental animals, Circulation, Vol. 91, 1995, pp. 2669.
Journal
Artery Research
Volume-Issue
16 - C
Pages
11 - 17
Publication Date
2016/09/19
ISSN (Online)
1876-4401
ISSN (Print)
1872-9312
DOI
10.1016/j.artres.2016.08.003How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2016 Association for Research into Arterial Structure and Physiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Piotr Kaźmierski
AU  - Michał Pająk
AU  - Katarzyna Bogusiak
PY  - 2016
DA  - 2016/09/19
TI  - Concomitance of atherosclerotic lesions in arteries of the lower extremities and carotid arteries in patients with abdominal aorta aneurysm
JO  - Artery Research
SP  - 11
EP  - 17
VL  - 16
IS  - C
SN  - 1876-4401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artres.2016.08.003
DO  - 10.1016/j.artres.2016.08.003
ID  - Kaźmierski2016
ER  -