“Fast Track Arbitration”; Comparative Analysis

DOI

10.2991/assehr.k.200917.011How to use a DOI?

Keywords

“fast track arbitration”, Expedited Arbitration

Abstract

Arbitration at present takes a lot of time and costs, which may create more burden to the losing party. The basic principle of being fast and efficient is one of the requirements of arbitration. Instead of going through the arbitration process, disputes parties may take simpler way to settle their disputes through arbitration. This is known as “fast track arbitration”. However not all cases can be conducted by “fast track arbitration”. The objective of this research is to understand and find out which cases can be settled using “fast track arbitration” and whether it is possible to be incorporated into Law No.30 Year 1999 regarding Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. This research used secondary data. This research uses qualitative and comparative approach to describe and discuss concept of “fast track arbitration”, which is also known as Expedited Arbitration. Researchers want to explore how “fast track arbitration” can be implemented in Indonesia by applying descriptive-comparative methods which compare regulations from several countries that may be used to support the amendment of the Law

Copyright

© 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Gunawan Widjaja
AU  - Andryawan
AU  - Victoria Regine Liando
PY  - 2020
DA  - 2020/09/17
TI  - “Fast Track Arbitration”; Comparative Analysis
BT  - Proceedings of the Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution International Conference (ADRIC 2019)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 43
EP  - 45
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200917.011
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.200917.011
ID  - Widjaja2020
ER  -