Comparison of Differences Between China and the United Nations in the Global Anti-epidemic Creative Propaganda and Calls
- DOI
- 10.2991/assehr.k.201127.125How to use a DOI?
- Keywords
- China, the United Nations, the globe, anti-epidemic, creative propaganda, posters, dissemination, differences
- Abstract
Purpose: Major public health events are fierce with extremely fast spread, which endanger life. The recall and research of visual creative propaganda for public health events will help clarify the special role and effective communication methods of creative propaganda under emergencies, and point out the direction for creative propaganda in the face of public health events in the future. Methods: Based on the global anti-epidemic creative propaganda collection activities sponsored by China and the United Nations, the differences and advantages of the two are analyzed, concluded, and summarized in detail from the background mission, nature of the collection, participants, propaganda content, work form, and communication thinking. Conclusion: China’s anti-epidemic creative collection has a great advantage in response speed and the number of works, and it cleanses people’s hearts in spreading hope and paying tribute. In addition, the United Nations is worth learning from in terms of communication thinking and communication media and scope. Although the global design community is not on the front line of fighting the epidemic, it still uses the wisdom of design to disseminate and share scientific and beneficial public health information, hoping to save more people’s lives and health.
- Copyright
- © 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
- Open Access
- This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Cite this article
TY - CONF AU - Yuan Tian PY - 2020 DA - 2020/11/28 TI - Comparison of Differences Between China and the United Nations in the Global Anti-epidemic Creative Propaganda and Calls BT - Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Education, Language and Inter-cultural Communication (ELIC 2020) PB - Atlantis Press SP - 625 EP - 629 SN - 2352-5398 UR - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201127.125 DO - 10.2991/assehr.k.201127.125 ID - Tian2020 ER -