Proceedings of the 2022 2nd International Conference on Economic Development and Business Culture (ICEDBC 2022)

<Previous Article In Volume
Next Article In Volume>

Which Was Better in the Context of Bringing NCEE Back to the Country, the Deferred Acceptance Algorithm or the Boston Mechanism

Authors
Jiahao Zhang1, *
1Rong Qiao Sedbergh School, Fuzhou, 350207, China
*Corresponding author. Email: canbu1401@163.com
Corresponding Author
Jiahao Zhang
Available Online 31 December 2022.
DOI
10.2991/978-94-6463-036-7_95How to use a DOI?
Keywords
deferred acceptance; Boston mechanism; NCEE
Abstract

Since its inception in Boston, the Boston mechanism has gained worldwide acclaim. Although there exist strong criticism and replacements happen often, economists have recently reconsidered its properties. The deferred acceptance algorithm (DA) has always been thought to be superior to the Boston mechanism because it has several distinguishing features when put in comparison. Countless studies have been conducted to investigate the two mechanisms, either directly in real-world market situations or through theoretical practices. But which is superior, and is one superior to the other in all circumstances? China’s National College Entrance Exam, also known as Gaokao, was established in 1952 and has undergone numerous changes since then. It was canceled for ten years due to the Cultural Revolution, which had negative impacts on China’s economy and the Chinese society. But NCEE was restored as the new leader came to prominence, with the Boston mechanism put in use. This paper compares DA with the Boston mechanism to investigate different implementation methods. Results show that DA would have played a better role if it was operated.

Copyright
© 2022 The Author(s)
Open Access
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Download article (PDF)

<Previous Article In Volume
Next Article In Volume>
Volume Title
Proceedings of the 2022 2nd International Conference on Economic Development and Business Culture (ICEDBC 2022)
Series
Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research
Publication Date
31 December 2022
ISBN
10.2991/978-94-6463-036-7_95
ISSN
2352-5428
DOI
10.2991/978-94-6463-036-7_95How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2022 The Author(s)
Open Access
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Cite this article

risenwbib
TY  - CONF
AU  - Jiahao Zhang
PY  - 2022
DA  - 2022/12/31
TI  - Which Was Better in the Context of Bringing NCEE Back to the Country, the Deferred Acceptance Algorithm or the Boston Mechanism
BT  - Proceedings of the 2022 2nd International Conference on Economic Development and Business Culture (ICEDBC 2022)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 638
EP  - 642
SN  - 2352-5428
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-036-7_95
DO  - 10.2991/978-94-6463-036-7_95
ID  - Zhang2022
ER  -