Resilience Indicators of the Tuva Residents Living in Rural and Urban Areas
- 10.2991/iceder-19.2020.64How to use a DOI?
- vitality, involvement, risk taking, control
The article presents the results of theoretical and empirical studies on the level of resilience of residents of the city of Kyzyl and regions of the Republic of Tyva. The results of processing the data obtained during a psychological and empirical study on a representative sample (373 people) using a technique to determine the level of vitality (S. Muddy) are described. The reliability of the established differences in the indicators of viability is checked using analytical mathematical statistics. The method of resilience developed by S. Muddy includes the following indicators: involvement, risk-taking, and control. According to the results of the study, significant differences among respondents living in the city of Kyzyl and in the regions of the republic were identified. The study finds a lower level of resilience in residents who live in rural areas. Respondents living in the city have a higher level of resilience in all respects.
- © 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
- Open Access
- This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Cite this article
TY - CONF AU - Ch Mongush AU - A Frocol AU - S Mombei-ool PY - 2020/01 DA - 2020/01 TI - Resilience Indicators of the Tuva Residents Living in Rural and Urban Areas BT - Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference on Education, Health and Human Wellbeing (ICEDER 2019) PB - Atlantis Press SP - 303 EP - 306 SN - 2352-5398 UR - https://doi.org/10.2991/iceder-19.2020.64 DO - 10.2991/iceder-19.2020.64 ID - Mongush2020/01 ER -