Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Hybrid Commerce, Human Capital, and Economic Dynamics (ICHCH 2025)

The Pricing Strategy of Stock Issuance between Tesla and Goldman Sachs from the Perspective of Game Theory

Authors
Feiyang Zhu1, *
1Faculty of Commerce, Hong Kong Shue Yan University, Hongkong, China
*Corresponding author. Email: 239A06@hksyu.edu.hk
Corresponding Author
Feiyang Zhu
Available Online 18 June 2026.
DOI
10.2991/978-2-38476-585-0_75How to use a DOI?
Keywords
Signal Game; Green-shoe Option; Separating Equilibrium; Goldman Sachs; Tesla
Abstract

The new energy vehicle industry is a capital-intensive sector characterized by rapid technological change. These features complicate stock pricing. Power battery development and super factory construction require continuous investment, while intensifying technical competition and declining subsidies increase valuation uncertainty. Tesla, as a market leader, has experienced significant valuation fluctuations, reflecting the pricing challenges faced by technology-driven automakers. Underwriters play a central role in this process. Although they may lower prices to attract investors or raise them to maximize commissions, Tesla’s 2020 offering was atypical: the issue price was set 7.7% above market value, yet Goldman Sachs charged only a 0.5% commission—far below the 2–3% industry average. This study examines this paradox through the lens of signal game theory. Tesla’s case demonstrates that greenshoe options effectively resolved the conflict by rebalancing the risk-reward structure: Goldman Sachs over-allocated 15% of shares and earned United States Dollar (USD) 248 million from the subsequent price increase. This outcome indicates that underwriting contracts have evolved into mechanisms that facilitate credible signal transmission. Within this framework, high prices serve as signals of high firm quality (θ=H), while underwriters achieve incentive compatibility through low fees and strategic use of greenshoe options. A dynamic game model identifies the conditions under which the “high price – low commission” equilibrium exists, providing a theoretical foundation for financing strategies tailored to technology-driven enterprises.

Copyright
© 2026 The Author(s)
Open Access
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Download article (PDF)

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Hybrid Commerce, Human Capital, and Economic Dynamics (ICHCH 2025)
Series
Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research
Publication Date
18 June 2026
ISBN
978-2-38476-585-0
ISSN
2352-5428
DOI
10.2991/978-2-38476-585-0_75How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2026 The Author(s)
Open Access
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Cite this article

TY  - CONF
AU  - Feiyang Zhu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/18
TI  - The Pricing Strategy of Stock Issuance between Tesla and Goldman Sachs from the Perspective of Game Theory
BT  - Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Hybrid Commerce, Human Capital, and Economic Dynamics (ICHCH 2025)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 660
EP  - 669
SN  - 2352-5428
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-585-0_75
DO  - 10.2991/978-2-38476-585-0_75
ID  - Zhu2026
ER  -