The Comparison between one and two dimensional up-and-down Method
Authors
Huan Xue, Yuxi Ma, Rui Ge, Long Yan, Lanxiang Kuang
Corresponding Author
Huan Xue
Available Online March 2015.
- DOI
- 10.2991/iiicec-15.2015.103How to use a DOI?
- Keywords
- WL700; Two dimensional up-and down Method; Fatigue Limit Strength; Relative Derivation.
- Abstract
The fatigue performances of two types of the automotive frame steel (AFS) include WL700 and WL510 are investigated. In order to take the thickness effect into account, two series of WL510 samples with 6mm and 8mm thickness respectively are selected. The fatigue strengths are calculated by one and two dimensional up-and-down method under dfifferent probability of failure and believe. The result shows that the relative deviation of fatigue strength using one dimensional method is much 3 to 4 times larger than two dimensional method. In addition, more experienced data brings more accurate result. The relative deviation of fatigue strengths become larger, when the probability of failure increased and probability of believe decreased.
- Copyright
- © 2015, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
- Open Access
- This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Cite this article
TY - CONF AU - Huan Xue AU - Yuxi Ma AU - Rui Ge AU - Long Yan AU - Lanxiang Kuang PY - 2015/03 DA - 2015/03 TI - The Comparison between one and two dimensional up-and-down Method BT - Proceedings of the 2015 International Industrial Informatics and Computer Engineering Conference PB - Atlantis Press SP - 450 EP - 453 SN - 2352-538X UR - https://doi.org/10.2991/iiicec-15.2015.103 DO - 10.2991/iiicec-15.2015.103 ID - Xue2015/03 ER -