Efficiency issues for managing priority national projects

DOI

10.2991/mplg-ia-19.2019.77How to use a DOI?

Keywords

public administration, priority national projects, project management, risks, socially significant projects, efficiency

Abstract

The issue of risk assessment in public administration has now become particularly urgent. One of the objectives of public administration in the face of risk is to improve the well-being of the population. In order to improve the well-being of the country's population, reduce the risk of the consequences of the economic crisis of 2008-2010, long years of stagnation, the executive branch has come to modern methods of governance, the bright representative of which is the transition priority national projects. The use of such methods greatly strengthens the role of the state in the management of socio-economic development. Both in May 2012 and in May 2018, the President of the Russian Federation in the "May decrees" defined the planned indicators for the main socio-economic areas of the country's development. The authors considered priority national projects, which are defined in the Russian President's message as projects of social orientation. The article considers the reasons for the decline in the effectiveness of the implementation of the "May decrees" of the Russian President in 2012, the implementation of which according to various data amounted to 70%. One of the reasons is the lack of application of project management methods. however, there has recently been an understanding of the need for project management. The authors examine in detail the risks of implementing the "May decrees" of the Russian President in 2018, among which the inability to control the targets of most programs is highlighted. The reasons for the decline in the effectiveness of government programs at different levels of government have been identified, and there is a tendency to increase the number of risks depending on the level of governance. unfortunately, the impact of the risks increases. Among the reasons for the decline in the effectiveness of priority national projects are organizational problems (lack of necessary vocational education, management and organization problems, features of stimulating the work of public servants, features of industry competition, a decline in the rating of public bodies in the eyes of citizens)and psychological deficiencies associated with loss of trust and understanding between citizens and government agencies, lack of honesty and openness of activity, low executive discipline of government officials. Of particular importance in the implementation of national program’s is the responsibility of officials at all levels because of the high social importance of their decisions. At the same time, according to the authors, it is necessary to establish the personal responsibility of officials both for achieving indicators of effectiveness, goals and targets, and for the organization of work on the implementation of national projects. E that would require the development of indicators to assess the effectiveness of those responsible.

Copyright

© 2019, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Alexei Lyalin
AU  - Anton Zozulya
AU  - Tatiana Eremina
AU  - Pavel Zozulya
AU  - Nikolay Malyshkin
PY  - 2019/12
DA  - 2019/12
TI  - Efficiency issues for managing priority national projects
BT  - Proceedings of the International Conference on Man-Power-Law-Governance: Interdisciplinary Approaches (MPLG-IA 2019)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 421
EP  - 426
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/mplg-ia-19.2019.77
DO  - 10.2991/mplg-ia-19.2019.77
ID  - Lyalin2019/12
ER  -