Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Sports, Arts, Education and Management Engineering (SAEME 2017)

The effect of different recovery methods on muscle swelling recovery after muscle fatigue

Authors
Fan Zhang, Zhuying Wang
Corresponding Author
Fan Zhang
Available Online July 2017.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2991/saeme-17.2017.90How to use a DOI?
Keywords
muscle swelling; muscle fatigue; centrifugal motion; vibration recovery; cryotherapy. L manuscripts
Abstract
This paper's purpose is to investigate the effect of passive recovery (PR), active recovery (AR), vibration recovery (VR) and cryotherapy recovery (CR) on muscle swelling Degree (SD) after muscle fatigue. 20 healthy male college students were enrolled in the study. SD of the biceps brachii of the non-handedness was measured. The differences and recovery effects of SD at different detection time points were tested by one-way repeated measures ANOVA. Results shows that Continuous AR of decreasing intensity cannot improve recovery of fatigue muscle and even increase SD after active concentric contraction and passive pulling at constant speed in low intensity of 45 ø/s. In addition, CR can effectively control tissue injury and SD problem due to centrifugal motion.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.

Download article (PDF)

Cite this article

TY  - CONF
AU  - Fan Zhang
AU  - Zhuying Wang
PY  - 2017/07
DA  - 2017/07
TI  - The effect of different recovery methods on muscle swelling recovery after muscle fatigue
BT  - 2017 International Conference on Sports, Arts, Education and Management Engineering (SAEME 2017)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 402
EP  - 405
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/saeme-17.2017.90
DO  - https://doi.org/10.2991/saeme-17.2017.90
ID  - Zhang2017/07
ER  -