Quality Assessment and Knowledge Discovery for Chinese Systematic Review/Meta-analysis of Hypertension Prevention and Control

DOI

10.2991/ssphe-18.2019.51How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Hypertension, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Quality assessment, Knowledge Discovery

Abstract

Systematic Review/Meta-analysis is the essential source of best evidence in medical research and its quality is necessary to assess due to the difference among researchers. The AMSTAR, PRISMA, cited frequency and downloads were used to assess the quality of domestic systematic review/meta-analysis about hypertension prevention and control from three perspectives including methodology, reporting and usage, and then discovered the evidence from the high methodologically quality literature. The current domestic systematic review/meta-analysis research counters different problems in the quality of methodology, reporting and usage, and further improvement of the methodological and standardization of the publication are needed to provide achievements and recommendations with a high evidence level.

Copyright

© 2019, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Jing Wang
AU  - Yuxing Qian
PY  - 2019/01
DA  - 2019/01
TI  - Quality Assessment and Knowledge Discovery for Chinese Systematic Review/Meta-analysis of Hypertension Prevention and Control
BT  - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Social Science, Public Health and Education (SSPHE 2018)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 214
EP  - 217
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/ssphe-18.2019.51
DO  - 10.2991/ssphe-18.2019.51
ID  - Wang2019/01
ER  -