Proceedings of the 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2021)

The Notary’s Responsibility for Unlawful Acts of Counterfeiting the Selling Power of Attorney in the Sale and Purchase Deed (Case Study of Tangerang District Court Decision Number 1443/Pid.B/2018/PN.Tng)

Authors
R. Rahaditya1, *, Eka Aprilia1
1Faculty of Law, Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia
*Corresponding author. Email: rahaditya@mku.untar.ac.id
Corresponding Author
R. Rahaditya
Available Online 21 April 2022.
DOI
10.2991/assehr.k.220404.053How to use a DOI?
Keywords
Notary Liability; Counterfeit; Power of Attorney
Abstract

Counterfeiting can be classified as a crime of fraud. Criminal acts in the form of falsification of the provisions are contained in Article 263 to Article 265 of the Criminal Code. The problem faced is how the notary’s responsibility for unlawful acts is to falsify the power of attorney to sell in the deed of sale (Case Study of Tangerang District Court Decision Number 1443/Pid.B/2018/PN.Tng.). The research method used is a normative juridical legal research method. The results of the study indicate that the responsibility of the notary for unlawful acts is to falsify the power of attorney to sell in the deed of sale and purchase related to the Tangerang District Court Decision Number 1443/Pid.B/2018/PN.Tng. is the proof of the actions committed by Notary Dr. Bambang Sudirmanto, SH, MKn intentionally with full awareness in planning fraudulent acts that cause losses, the notary can be subject to administrative sanctions as stipulated in Article 85 of the UUJN regarding violations of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter a of the UUJN. Sanctions that can be imposed are verbal warnings, written warnings, temporary dismissals, respectful and dishonorable dismissals. Can also be subject to criminal sanctions. In order to protect the interests of the notary parties, they must act in accordance with the laws and regulations for the position of a notary and upholding the notary code of ethics.

Copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

Download article (PDF)

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2021)
Series
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research
Publication Date
21 April 2022
ISBN
978-94-6239-567-1
ISSN
2352-5398
DOI
10.2991/assehr.k.220404.053How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

Cite this article

TY  - CONF
AU  - R. Rahaditya
AU  - Eka Aprilia
PY  - 2022
DA  - 2022/04/21
TI  - The Notary’s Responsibility for Unlawful Acts of Counterfeiting the Selling Power of Attorney in the Sale and Purchase Deed (Case Study of Tangerang District Court Decision Number 1443/Pid.B/2018/PN.Tng)
BT  - Proceedings of the 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2021)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 341
EP  - 347
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220404.053
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.220404.053
ID  - Rahaditya2022
ER  -