Proceedings of the 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2021)

Responsibility Analysis of the Directorate General of IPR Regarding the Case of Name Doing / Passing Off Against the Famous brand “M&G” Reviewed from Law Number 20 of 2016 Regarding Brand and Casual Geographic Indications (526K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2020)

Authors
Michael Michael1, Christine S.T. Kansil1, *
1Faculty of Law, Universitas Tarumanagara, West Jakarta - 11440, Indonesia
*Corresponding author. Email: christinestkansil@fh.untar.ac.id
Corresponding Author
Christine S.T. Kansil
Available Online 21 April 2022.
DOI
10.2991/assehr.k.220404.167How to use a DOI?
Keywords
trademark; Intellectual Property Rights
Abstract

In the era of global trade, in line with international conventions that have been ratified by Indonesia, the role of Trademarks and Geographical Indications is very important, especially in maintaining fair, fair business competition, consumer protection, as well as protecting Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises and domestic Industries. Intellectual Property Rights in legal science are divided into 2 (two) groups, namely Copyright (Copy Right), Industrial Property Rights (Industrial Property Right) where Industrial Property Rights consist of Patents (Patents), Trademarks (Trademarks), Industrial Designs (Industry Design), Prevention of Unfair Competition Practices (Repression of Unfair Competition), Layout Design of Integrated Circuit, and Trade Secrets. Right to a Mark is the scope of Property Rights because the right to a brand is the right to use a sign or brand to distinguish a person’s trade product from the products of others, even though it does not have the basic elements as defined by the definition of intellectual property, namely there is no element of intellectual effort in form of creation or invention. However, there are similarities between copyrights, patents and trademark rights seen from the nature or form of the rights, namely the rights to intangible objects.

Copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

Download article (PDF)

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2021)
Series
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research
Publication Date
21 April 2022
ISBN
10.2991/assehr.k.220404.167
ISSN
2352-5398
DOI
10.2991/assehr.k.220404.167How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

Cite this article

TY  - CONF
AU  - Michael Michael
AU  - Christine S.T. Kansil
PY  - 2022
DA  - 2022/04/21
TI  - Responsibility Analysis of the Directorate General of IPR Regarding the Case of Name Doing / Passing Off Against the Famous brand “M&G” Reviewed from Law Number 20 of 2016 Regarding Brand and Casual Geographic Indications (526K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2020)
BT  - Proceedings of the 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2021)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 1058
EP  - 1063
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220404.167
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.220404.167
ID  - Michael2022
ER  -