Proceedings of the Universitas Lampung International Conference on Social Sciences (ULICoSS 2021)

Mitigation of Indonesia Concurrent Election Dispute Settlement in 2024

Authors
Ari Wirya Dinataaridinata@unib.ac.id
Constitutional Law, Bengkulu University, Bengkulu, Indonesia
M. Yusuf Akbaryusufakbarbkl@gmail.com
Constitutional Law, Bengkulu University, Bengkulu, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Ari Wirya Dinataaridinata@unib.ac.id
Available Online 6 January 2022.
DOI
10.2991/assehr.k.220102.055How to use a DOI?
Keywords
Concurrent Election 2024; Dispute Settlement; Democracy
Abstract

Based on Constitutional Court verdict Number 55 / PUU-XVII / 2019 which was released out on February 26, 2020, ordering the implementation of concurrent general elections. In 2019 was the first experience of holding general elections simultaneously with 5 (five) boxes and 5 (five) types of ballots, namely the presidential election, the election for members of the People’s Representative Council, the Provincial Regional People’s Representative Council, the Regency /City Regional People’s Representative Council, and Regional Representative Council simultaneous nationally. This simultaneous general election system is extremely complicated in the process. It is not only complex but also takes a lot of victims based on experience in 2019 due to the large workload of the organizers. The massiveness and size of this democratic party caused difficulties for the organizers of both the general election commission, the election supervisory body, and the honorary council of election organizers in carrying out their duties. Not to mention, in 2024 the simultaneous general elections in Indonesia will not only be elections at the national level but also include elections at the regional level to elect governors, regents / mayors. Every general elecation event always ends in a dispute over the results of the general election. The Constitutional Court as a state institution that had the authority to settle disputes over the results of general elections (Article 24 C of the 1945 Constitution) will certainly reap the same impact if all disputed results are submitted to the Constitutional Court simultaneously. Meanwhile, the Constitutional Court is the last resort in upholding electoral justice. This paper uses a normative juridical research approach to concepts, theories and legislation. The data used are secondary data with primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. This paper tries to answer the challenges of concurrent election dispute resolution in 2024 by providing an idea of limiting margins to file a lawsuit, and a dismissal process that involves academics at the local level to handle disputed cases of results in regional head elections both governors, regents or mayors.

Copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.
Open Access
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.

Download article (PDF)

Volume Title
Proceedings of the Universitas Lampung International Conference on Social Sciences (ULICoSS 2021)
Series
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research
Publication Date
6 January 2022
ISBN
10.2991/assehr.k.220102.055
ISSN
2352-5398
DOI
10.2991/assehr.k.220102.055How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.
Open Access
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

TY  - CONF
AU  - Ari Wirya Dinata
AU  - M. Yusuf Akbar
PY  - 2022
DA  - 2022/01/06
TI  - Mitigation of Indonesia Concurrent Election Dispute Settlement in 2024
BT  - Proceedings of the Universitas Lampung International Conference on Social Sciences (ULICoSS 2021)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 426
EP  - 435
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220102.055
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.220102.055
ID  - Dinata2022
ER  -