Proceedings of the 2nd Aceh International Dental Meeting 2021 (AIDEM 2021)

<Previous Article In Volume
Next Article In Volume>

Study of Microleakage between Material Restoration Glass Ionomer Cement and Alkasite in Class V Cavity (G.V. Black)

Authors
Iin Sundari1, *, Diana Setya Ningsih2, Raudhatul Jannah3
1Department of Dental Material, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia
2Department of Dental Material, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia
3Undergraduate Student of Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, 23111, Indonesia
*Corresponding Author email: rh_iin@unsyiah.ac.id
Corresponding Author
Iin Sundari
Available Online 3 March 2022.
DOI
10.2991/ahsr.k.220302.007How to use a DOI?
Keywords
microleakage; glass ionomer; alkasite; class V
Abstract

Microleakage is a gap between the surface of the tooth and the restoration caused by the failure of the restoration. Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) and Alkasite are materials with good clinical appearance, but the mechanical strength of GIC was lower than Alkasite and the microleakage occurs in both restorations. Purpose: This study aims to determine the microleakage between GIC and Alkasite restorations in the Class V cavity for 1 day, 7 days, and 30 days after restoration in the tooth. Materials and methods: This study used 30 maxillary premolars and was divided into six groups. Group A restored by GIC and group B by Alkasite. Groups A1 and B1 were restored and incubated for 1 day, groups A2 and B2 for 7 days, groups A3 and B3 for 30 days. All specimens were incubated at 37ºC and isolated with nail varnish except for the restored areas before immersion with 1% methylene blue at room temperature for 1 day. The specimens were cleaned and cut longitudinally, then observed by a stereomicroscope and scored 0-4. Results: Average values of GIC and Alkasite microleakage after 1 day were greater than 7 days and 30 days. a Comparison of the average microleakage values of GIC and Alkasite shows microleakage values of GIC are greater than Alkasite. However, statistical analysis test results showed that there were no significant microleakage values between GIC and Alkasite after 1 day, 7 days, and 30 days (p> 0.05).

Copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press International B.V.
Open Access
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.

Download article (PDF)

<Previous Article In Volume
Next Article In Volume>
Volume Title
Proceedings of the 2nd Aceh International Dental Meeting 2021 (AIDEM 2021)
Series
Advances in Health Sciences Research
Publication Date
3 March 2022
ISBN
10.2991/ahsr.k.220302.007
ISSN
2468-5739
DOI
10.2991/ahsr.k.220302.007How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press International B.V.
Open Access
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.

Cite this article

risenwbib
TY  - CONF
AU  - Iin Sundari
AU  - Diana Setya Ningsih
AU  - Raudhatul Jannah
PY  - 2022
DA  - 2022/03/03
TI  - Study of Microleakage between Material Restoration Glass Ionomer Cement and Alkasite in Class V Cavity (G.V. Black)
BT  - Proceedings of the 2nd Aceh International Dental Meeting 2021 (AIDEM 2021)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 40
EP  - 45
SN  - 2468-5739
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/ahsr.k.220302.007
DO  - 10.2991/ahsr.k.220302.007
ID  - Sundari2022
ER  -