A Review of Authenticity Analysis of the Recovered Memories

DOI

10.2991/assehr.k.211020.252How to use a DOI?

Keywords

recovered memory, false memory, suggestibility, source misattribution, bias, confabulation

Abstract

This paper adopts the literature research method to aim to discuss the authenticity of recovered memories by summarizing the causes of formation of truly recovered memories and false recovered memories, which covers the concept of repression, amnesia and dissociation in positive, as well suggestibility in negative. A few hypothesis about other concepts of false recovered memories would also be given, such as source attribution, bias as well confabulation. At last, the methods of how to detect the false memories and suggestions of how to avoid them would be stated for both interested people, and occupational subjects who require relevant knowledge.

Copyright

© 2021, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Bonan Chen
PY  - 2021
DA  - 2021/10/21
TI  - A Review of Authenticity Analysis of the Recovered Memories
BT  - Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Public Relations and Social Sciences (ICPRSS 2021)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 754
EP  - 758
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211020.252
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.211020.252
ID  - Chen2021
ER  -