The Tension between the Patent Act and the Lanham Act in the US -- Taking the Trade Dress Protection for Product Configuration for Example
Available Online September 2018.
- https://doi.org/10.2991/icsshe-18.2018.82How to use a DOI?
- trade dress protection, product configuration, Patent Act, Lanham Act
- For many years, many courts have been confused about the question of whether trade dress protection under the Lanham Act can be applied to product configuration in an expired utility patent. Some courts insisted that if the product configuration is nonfunctional, it could obtain trade dress protection. While the Tenth Circuit held that if the product configuration comprising a “significant inventive component” of a previous utility patent, then trade dresses protection is not available to it, no need to consider its functionality. After that, the district court refused to use the functionality analysis, a bright line test was given by the district court that allowing, “slavish copying” of the “best mode” of a patent. The courts have been spilt with regard to this issue. This essay is trying to present the limited trade dress protection can be given for production configuration in an expired utility patent, so the Patent Act and the Lanham Act can be reconciled to some extent.
- Open Access
- This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.
Cite this article
TY - CONF AU - Wei Zhang PY - 2018/09 DA - 2018/09 TI - The Tension between the Patent Act and the Lanham Act in the US -- Taking the Trade Dress Protection for Product Configuration for Example BT - Proceedings of the 2018 4th International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education (ICSSHE 2018) PB - Atlantis Press SP - 337 EP - 340 SN - 2352-5398 UR - https://doi.org/10.2991/icsshe-18.2018.82 DO - https://doi.org/10.2991/icsshe-18.2018.82 ID - Zhang2018/09 ER -