Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Sports Sciences, Physical Education and Health (ICSSPEH 2020)

A Comparative Study on the Training Programs of Chinese and Russian Sports Doctoral Students

Authors
Maosen Guan, Huawei Wang, Mengqi Li
Corresponding Author
Maosen Guan
Available Online 5 August 2020.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200804.112How to use a DOI?
Keywords
China, Russia, doctor of physical education, cultivation plan, the comparative study
Abstract

The training program of sports doctor in Russia is of great significance to the construction and reform of the theoretical system of the training program of sports doctor in China in the new period and to guide the training and development of sports doctor in China. Through literature method, comparison method and on-the-spot investigation method, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the professional setting, training objective, training mode, course setting, credit and class hours of the research and training of Ph. D. in physical education in the “Two Schools” (the Two Schools refer to the School of Physical Education and Health, Krasnoyarsk State Teachers’ University, Russia and the School of Physical Education and Sport, Henan University, China; and they are hereinafter referred to as the “Two Schools”). The results show that: First, in terms of sports professional setting, China has more extensive fields and more professional directions, while in Russia, sports professional setting is more specific and refined. Second, there is a certain degree of similarity in their cultivation objectives; both countries attach great importance to the training of educational teachers and scientific research personnel. Third, the training methods of the two countries are basically the same in terms of learning. In the training program of Russia, there is no explicit requirement of “learning knowledge of other subjects”. Although there are abundant settings in such subjects, there is a lack of supervision measures in the training program of sports doctor. Fourth, China attaches great importance to professional theoretical courses and the cultivation of students’ professional theoretical knowledge, while less curriculum of professional theory is set in Russia. Fifth, the class hours of Ph. D. in Physical Education in China are significantly less than those in Russia. Therefore, the service scope and work direction of the research field should be clearly defined, and the class hours should be appropriately increased.

Copyright
© 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Sports Sciences, Physical Education and Health (ICSSPEH 2020)
Series
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research
Publication Date
5 August 2020
ISBN
10.2991/assehr.k.200804.112
ISSN
2352-5398
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200804.112How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Cite this article

TY  - CONF
AU  - Maosen Guan
AU  - Huawei Wang
AU  - Mengqi Li
PY  - 2020
DA  - 2020/08/05
TI  - A Comparative Study on the Training Programs of Chinese and Russian Sports Doctoral Students
BT  - Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Sports Sciences, Physical Education and Health (ICSSPEH 2020)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 99
EP  - 106
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200804.112
DO  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200804.112
ID  - Guan2020
ER  -