Bibliometric Profile of Science Education Research on Argumentation and the Contribution of Indonesia
- 10.2991/aer.k.211215.085How to use a DOI?
- Argumentation; Bibliometric; Science Education; VOSviewer
This study aims to describe the profile of argumentation research in science education and reveal the contributions of researchers from Indonesia based on the Scopus database education. It is used bibliometric analysis. Based on the visualization analysis of the research profile, “science education argumentation” resulting in three major clusters and one little cluster: (1) argumentation in the theoretical domain (2) argumentation in the implementation domain (3) argumentation in the development models domain and (4) argumentation in the scientific argumentation discourse domain. Erduran is the most productive researcher, but Osborne is the most influential researcher in the field of scientific argumentation. The direction trend of argumentation research is developing from theoretical, philosophical to practical. Implementation matters to improve students’ argumentation skills on increasingly broad material topics. The research findings are expected to help related researchers to recognize the trend of argumentative research in science education globally and recommend directions for further study.
- © 2021 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press International B.V.
- Open Access
- This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.
Cite this article
TY - CONF AU - Setyo Admoko AU - Mukhayyarotin N. R. J. AU - Eko Hariyono AU - Madlazim PY - 2021 DA - 2021/12/16 TI - Bibliometric Profile of Science Education Research on Argumentation and the Contribution of Indonesia BT - Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Science and Engineering 2021 (IJCSE 2021) PB - Atlantis Press SP - 502 EP - 509 SN - 2352-5401 UR - https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.211215.085 DO - 10.2991/aer.k.211215.085 ID - Admoko2021 ER -