Bibliometric Profile of Science Education Research on Argumentation and the Contribution of Indonesia

DOI

10.2991/aer.k.211215.085How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Argumentation; Bibliometric; Science Education; VOSviewer

Abstract

This study aims to describe the profile of argumentation research in science education and reveal the contributions of researchers from Indonesia based on the Scopus database education. It is used bibliometric analysis. Based on the visualization analysis of the research profile, “science education argumentation” resulting in three major clusters and one little cluster: (1) argumentation in the theoretical domain (2) argumentation in the implementation domain (3) argumentation in the development models domain and (4) argumentation in the scientific argumentation discourse domain. Erduran is the most productive researcher, but Osborne is the most influential researcher in the field of scientific argumentation. The direction trend of argumentation research is developing from theoretical, philosophical to practical. Implementation matters to improve students’ argumentation skills on increasingly broad material topics. The research findings are expected to help related researchers to recognize the trend of argumentative research in science education globally and recommend directions for further study.

Copyright

© 2021 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press International B.V.

Open Access

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Setyo Admoko
AU  - Mukhayyarotin N. R. J.
AU  - Eko Hariyono
AU  - Madlazim
PY  - 2021
DA  - 2021/12/16
TI  - Bibliometric Profile of Science Education Research on Argumentation and the Contribution of Indonesia
BT  - Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Science and Engineering 2021 (IJCSE 2021)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 502
EP  - 509
SN  - 2352-5401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.211215.085
DO  - 10.2991/aer.k.211215.085
ID  - Admoko2021
ER  -