Breaking the Stereotypes: Analysis and Prevention of Criminal Misjudged Cases in the Procedure of Criminal Detection from the Perspective of Evidentiary Adjudication

DOI

10.2991/sschd-16.2016.40How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Evidentiary adjudication; criminal misjudged case; criminal investigations

Abstract

in criminal proceedings many misjudged cases begin with violating and ignoring the principle of evidentiary adjudication and correlative institutional rules. The principle of evidentiary adjudication ought to be adhered to at the investigation stage and the previous "investigation centrism" ought to be abstained from. Investigation activities ought to be trial-centered. Torture, false confession, expert opinion flaws and ignorance of exculpatory evidence are major causes at the investigation stage resulting in misjudged cases. Such stereotypes in judicial practice as mentioned above are directly or indirectly in violation of the principle of evidentiary adjudication. Consequently, the principle of evidentiary adjudication and correlative institutional rules ought to be adhered to so as to advance the normalization, systematization and substantiation of the prevention and control of misjudged cases.

Copyright

© 2016, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Min Chen
AU  - Dao-Yong Tu
PY  - 2015/12
DA  - 2015/12
TI  - Breaking the Stereotypes: Analysis and Prevention of Criminal Misjudged Cases in the Procedure of Criminal Detection from the Perspective of Evidentiary Adjudication
BT  - Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference on Social Science and Contemporary Humanity Development
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 204
EP  - 207
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/sschd-16.2016.40
DO  - 10.2991/sschd-16.2016.40
ID  - Chen2015/12
ER  -