Reappealing the Case of Unjust Enrichment and Its Dilemma and Resolution

DOI

10.2991/assehr.k.200205.026How to use a DOI?

Keywords

unjust enrichment, private lending, two lawsuits judge’s right of interpretation

Abstract

In judicial practice, re-appealing unjust enrichment cases is characterized by unfair profit and private lending, unjust enrichment and debt default, unjust enrichment and investment relationship. In the case of re-indictment of unjust enrichment, whether there is legality in the act of subpoena; whether the evidence of the prosecution affects the evidence of the post-suit is reasonable; To resolve the dilemma of the procedure of unjust enrichment, it is necessary to expand the system of interpretation of judges and use the methods of judges in litigation to resolve relevant procedural issues.

Copyright

© 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Wei Lin
PY  - 2020
DA  - 2020/02/13
TI  - Reappealing the Case of Unjust Enrichment and Its Dilemma and Resolution
BT  - Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Social Science, Public Health and Education (SSPHE 2019)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 116
EP  - 121
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200205.026
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.200205.026
ID  - Lin2020
ER  -