Comparison of Ecological Economics Policy between Developed Countries and China

DOI

10.2991/assehr.k.220701.029How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Ecological economics; Social sustainability; Sustainable development; Ecological economics policy

Abstract

In recent years, more and more countries aware that the black economic development is unsustainable. Different countries and organizations have taken measures to promote the development of an ecological economics society. China has already constructed a worldwide economic powerhouse. In the twenty-first century, China faces a new challenge: i.e., creating an adaptive state in the face of limited resources in order to address rising social disparity and climatic unpredictability. China has disadvantages in building an ecological economics society as compared to other developed countries. China is still in the midst of fast industrialization and urbanization, which necessitates the construction of large-scale infrastructure. China’s manufacturing sector has a relatively low overall technological level. Industries that use a lot of resources are still prevalent. Chinese financial institutions have begun to acknowledge the necessity for special policies to foster long-term growth and have redirected their development financing accordingly. Providing sufficient financial support for green development on both the supply and demand sides is difficult. Therefore, small-scale projects may have a better chance of achieving both poverty alleviation and environmental protection.

Copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Jiaxin Li
PY  - 2022
DA  - 2022/07/04
TI  - Comparison of Ecological Economics Policy between Developed Countries and China
BT  - Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Science and Technology Ethics and Human Future (STEHF 2022)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 143
EP  - 146
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220701.029
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.220701.029
ID  - Li2022
ER  -