The Application of Human Judgment and Statistical Judgment in Medical Decision-Making and the Analysis of the Reasons for the Deviation of Human Judgment

DOI

10.2991/assehr.k.220701.016How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Human Judgment; Statistical Judgment; Rosenthal Effect; Medical Decision-Making

Abstract

Human judgment and statistical judgment are the most commonly used judgment methods in life. Rational use can effectively help people improve work efficiency and accuracy. This paper is devoted to studying the advantages and disadvantages of these two judgment methods in the medical field. Only when people have a clear understanding of the judgment method can they correctly choose the judgment method. This paper mainly selects literature analysis, theoretical analysis, case analysis and similar comparison to show the characteristics of the two judgment methods. It is preliminarily found that there are some deficiencies in both manual judgment and statistical judgment, and it is difficult to completely overcome them in the context of big data at this stage. However, they help each other, and reasonable interactive use can minimize the judgment error in medical decision-making.

Copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Yinzhu Mao
PY  - 2022
DA  - 2022/07/04
TI  - The Application of Human Judgment and Statistical Judgment in Medical Decision-Making and the Analysis of the Reasons for the Deviation of Human Judgment
BT  - Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Science and Technology Ethics and Human Future (STEHF 2022)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 82
EP  - 86
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220701.016
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.220701.016
ID  - Mao2022
ER  -