Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response

Volume 8, Issue 2, June 2018, Pages 75 - 84

Using Trust Game for Cross-Strait Security Risk Analysis

Authors
Cheng-Kuang Wu, Chongfu Huang
Corresponding Author
Cheng-Kuang Wu
Received 22 March 2018, Accepted 5 April 2018, Available Online 30 June 2018.
DOI
10.2991/jrarc.2018.8.2.3How to use a DOI?
Keywords
trust game, Nash equilibrium, bilateral trust, security risk
Abstract

The interactions of the Mainland China offering benefits, the Taiwan benefits return, and the benefits of China-Taiwan bilateral trust between the China and Taiwan are modeled as a trust game. The trust strategy is best response for China and Taiwan if the benefit of China-Taiwan bilateral trust is increased based on Nash equilibrium analysis. This study simulated a mixed strategy Nash equilibrium. Experimental results show that the China’s expected payoffs of N.E. fix and Taiwan’s expected payoffs of N.E. are increased if the payoffs of China-Taiwan bi-lateral trust are increased. The Chinese mainland released new measures on exchanges and cooperation with Taiwan. Taiwan accepts these measures results in favor of Taiwan’s expected payoffs and decreases the level of risk.

Copyright
© 2018, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

Journal
Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response
Volume-Issue
8 - 2
Pages
75 - 84
Publication Date
2018/06/30
ISSN (Online)
2210-8505
ISSN (Print)
2210-8491
DOI
10.2991/jrarc.2018.8.2.3How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2018, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Cite this article

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Cheng-Kuang Wu
AU  - Chongfu Huang
PY  - 2018
DA  - 2018/06/30
TI  - Using Trust Game for Cross-Strait Security Risk Analysis
JO  - Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response
SP  - 75
EP  - 84
VL  - 8
IS  - 2
SN  - 2210-8505
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/jrarc.2018.8.2.3
DO  - 10.2991/jrarc.2018.8.2.3
ID  - Wu2018
ER  -