Three Methods of Online Learning in Studying Law for Students’ Critical Thinking: Which One is More Effective?

DOI

10.2991/assehr.k.220108.002How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Critical Thinking; Effectiveness; Law Learning Methods

Abstract

The pandemic condition for online learning of Civics Education created not only a challenge for students but also for teachers, material dealing with law for students in Senior High School was considered difficult because it contained only theory and concepts. This caused students to tend to be less skilled in critical thinking. Therefore, teachers must look for effective learning methods and then the characteristics must be tailored to the needs of students. This study aimed to determine the difference in effectiveness and which method was more effective between courtroom methods, debate and law comparison between countries. The research design was quantitative with an experimental approach. The comparison of the three methods was a novelty apart from the online method, the three of them were considered to be effective with a significance of 0.081 (Sig.> 0.05) and the learning method using the courtroom was more effective than the debate method and law comparison.

Copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL.

Open Access

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license.

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Agustinus Tampubolon
AU  - Margi Wahono
AU  - Pat Kurniati
AU  - Matang Matang
AU  - Wachid P
PY  - 2022
DA  - 2022/01/21
TI  - Three Methods of Online Learning in Studying Law for Students’ Critical Thinking: Which One is More Effective?
BT  - Proceedings of the Annual Civic Education Conference (ACEC 2021)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 6
EP  - 10
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220108.002
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.220108.002
ID  - Tampubolon2022
ER  -