Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2018)

Comparing the Vocabulary Classification and Keyword Analysis Approaches to Determining Technical Vocabulary of Islamic Studies

Authors
Srifani Simbuka, Wachyu Sundayana, Fuad A. Hamied, Deny A. Kwary
Corresponding Author
Srifani Simbuka
Available Online June 2019.
DOI
10.2991/conaplin-18.2019.269How to use a DOI?
Keywords
corpus-based approach; Islamic religious studies; keyword analysis; technical vocabulary; vocabulary classification
Abstract

Dealing with technical vocabulary is one of the essentials of English Language Teaching (ELT), yet it is still a major concern for learners and teachers who are bound to specific purposes of learning English. This paper reports on and compares two approaches to determining words to be included in a technical vocabulary list in the area of Islamic Religious studies (IRS): the vocabulary classification versus the keyword analysis. The first approach results in a list of four categories of words, namely high frequency words, academic words, technical vocabulary and low frequency words. Keyword analysis is the second approach, in which the end product is a list of words that saliently characterize certain texts. Drawing on the data of the Corpus of Islamic Religious Studies Textbooks in Indonesian Islamic State Institute, the two approaches are compared in terms of theoretical basis, method of analysis, and their end product. The target corpus (305,701 running words) is developed from core textbooks of Islamic religious studies whose content are aligned with the curriculum of Indonesian Islamic state universities. The merits and shortcomings of each approach are also elaborated. The result shows that a major difference between these two approaches is the presence or absence of some GSL word types in the two lists of technical vocabulary in Islamic religious studies.

Copyright
© 2019, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

Volume Title
Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2018)
Series
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research
Publication Date
June 2019
ISBN
10.2991/conaplin-18.2019.269
ISSN
2352-5398
DOI
10.2991/conaplin-18.2019.269How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2019, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Cite this article

TY  - CONF
AU  - Srifani Simbuka
AU  - Wachyu Sundayana
AU  - Fuad A. Hamied
AU  - Deny A. Kwary
PY  - 2019/06
DA  - 2019/06
TI  - Comparing the Vocabulary Classification and Keyword Analysis Approaches to Determining Technical Vocabulary of Islamic Studies
BT  - Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2018)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 277
EP  - 282
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/conaplin-18.2019.269
DO  - 10.2991/conaplin-18.2019.269
ID  - Simbuka2019/06
ER  -