Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Humanities and Social Science

<Previous Article In Volume
Next Article In Volume>

Two Bases of Oakeshott’s Political Philosophy

Authors
Liming Zheng
Corresponding Author
Liming Zheng
Available Online January 2016.
DOI
10.2991/hss-26.2016.136How to use a DOI?
Keywords
Political philosophy, Practice, Behavior.
Abstract

Oakeshott’s viewpoint of the relation of philosophy and practice is the basis of his critique of rationalism in politics. The relative separation between philosophy and practice is Oakeshott’s consistent viewpoint. He denotes that modern philosophy is stuck in rationalism. His critique of rationalism in politics is to let philosophy and practice abide by one's own duty. Rationalism, which is now excessively in close relation with politics, must be stripped from it.

Copyright
© 2016, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

<Previous Article In Volume
Next Article In Volume>
Volume Title
Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Humanities and Social Science
Series
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research
Publication Date
January 2016
ISBN
10.2991/hss-26.2016.136
ISSN
2352-5398
DOI
10.2991/hss-26.2016.136How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2016, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Cite this article

risenwbib
TY  - CONF
AU  - Liming Zheng
PY  - 2016/01
DA  - 2016/01
TI  - Two Bases of Oakeshott’s Political Philosophy
BT  - Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Humanities and Social Science
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 825
EP  - 827
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/hss-26.2016.136
DO  - 10.2991/hss-26.2016.136
ID  - Zheng2016/01
ER  -