Performance Analysis and Supplier Evaluation using Analytical Hierarchy Process and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution at the Shipyard Company

DOI

10.2991/978-2-494069-83-1_98How to use a DOI?

Keywords

AHP; TOPSIS; SCOR Model; Supplier’s performance; and Supply Chain Management

Abstract

Performance assessment at shipyard companies only includes price criteria, product quality, and ownership of SKT as a registered supplier in the company. This performance assessment is considered not optimal so that there are problems caused by suppliers every year by different suppliers. Based on these problems, this research was conducted to determine the criteria and sub-criteria that have a major influence on supplier performance assessment by using metrics in the SCOR Model but also taking into account the company's needs and then assessing supplier performance based on predetermined criteria and sub-criteria. The weighting of the performance assessment criteria and sub-criteria is carried out by the AHP method and the supplier performance assessment is carried out by the TOPSIS method. The results obtained by the AHP method are that the quality criteria get the largest weight, namely 0.401, cost (0.288), reliability (0.215), responsiveness (0.215) and agility (0.107). The results of the sub-criteria weighting get the sub-criteria with the highest weight, namely price stability (0.381), delivery performance to commit date (0.412), responsiveness to complaints (0.750), upside source adaptability (0.425), quality of product (0.835). Based on the results of the consumable supplier performance assessment, the top 5 suppliers were obtained with supplier codes SEJA21CS, ACR23CS, IMP25CS, AFM12CS, KPRI20CS. Based on the results of the performance evaluation, it was found that there were 2 suppliers with very good assessment results, 7 suppliers with good assessment results, 10 suppliers with sufficient assessment results, 6 suppliers with poor assessment results, and 5 suppliers with very poor assessment results.

Copyright

© 2022 The Author(s)

Open Access

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Salsa Tara Aska
AU  - Yugowati Praharsi
AU  - Gaguk Suhardjito
PY  - 2022
DA  - 2022/12/30
TI  - Performance Analysis and Supplier Evaluation using Analytical Hierarchy Process and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution at the Shipyard Company
BT  - Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Science and Technology on Social Science 2022 (iCAST-SS 2022)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 553
EP  - 562
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-83-1_98
DO  - 10.2991/978-2-494069-83-1_98
ID  - Aska2022
ER  -