Proceedings of the XVII International Research-to-Practice Conference dedicated to the memory of M.I. Kovalyov (ICK 2020)

Justice of Punishment as Social Compromise

Authors
V.N. Voronin
Corresponding Author
V.N. Voronin
Available Online 24 March 2020.
DOI
10.2991/assehr.k.200321.085How to use a DOI?
Keywords
social justice, purposes of punishment, criteria of justice, measure of punishment, judge
Abstract

For finding the way of achieving a just punishment we drew up a special questionary containing open question and conducted a survey among 350 federal judges from 20 subjects of the Russian Federation. The survey was conducted in the course of 2017 by forwarding the questionaries to the courts of all regions; in January 2018, we analyzed and summarized the resulted obtained. We selectively studies sentences passed by judges from the same regions and concluded that there are several possible options: 1. Court gave a correct appraisal of the criteria of justice provided by law, though the public does not consider the punishment to be fair. Therefore, social level of justice is unrealized; it may result from deformation in public consciousness as for certain legal processes, although, while imposing punishment a judge must aspire to realize social public will and minimize social opposition as for the penalty imposed; 2. The court gave incorrect appraisal of legal criteria and punishment may not be considered as fair, nevertheless, due to the deformation in public consciousness, the public may still regard such punishment as fair, though it not being the said. 3. Finally, the most favorable situation – when a sentence is passed in compliance with all legal criteria and successfully undergoes social expertise; in this case, one may say that justice is attained and the punishment is fair.

Copyright
© 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

Volume Title
Proceedings of the XVII International Research-to-Practice Conference dedicated to the memory of M.I. Kovalyov (ICK 2020)
Series
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research
Publication Date
24 March 2020
ISBN
10.2991/assehr.k.200321.085
ISSN
2352-5398
DOI
10.2991/assehr.k.200321.085How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
Open Access
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Cite this article

TY  - CONF
AU  - V.N. Voronin
PY  - 2020
DA  - 2020/03/24
TI  - Justice of Punishment as Social Compromise
BT  - Proceedings of the XVII International Research-to-Practice Conference dedicated to the memory of M.I. Kovalyov (ICK 2020)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 62
EP  - 66
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200321.085
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.200321.085
ID  - Voronin2020
ER  -