Conceptual Biotechnology Measured by Using a Two-Tier Multiple Test
- DOI
- 10.2991/assehr.k.200129.069How to use a DOI?
- Keywords
- biotechnology, two tier multiple test
- Abstract
Biotechnology is a concept that combines biology and technology. The concept of Biotechnology in this research is divided into 4 based on the Rainbow Code of Biotechnology (RCB). This research aimed to measure the concept of biotechnology using a Two-Tier Multiple Test (TTMC). This research consists of two methods, namely qualitative and quantitative methods. TTMC was developed using a procedure defined by Borg and Gall. TTMC consists of 20 questions and tested to 137 students to collect data. Based on the research findings, it can be concluded that TTMC assessment instruments developed is feasible and meets the criteria as a good question with the content validity (CV) of 1.00, an average score of the reliability test of 0.92 of a very high category, the level of difficulty of 79.2% with a moderate category and 16.7% with a difficult category, and the discriminating power of 18.7% with a very good category and 39.6% with a good category. The TTMC instrument developed for measuring biotechnology material is sufficient to measure understanding of biotechnology with 41.6% of consistency. The research results show that the two-tier tests are effective in determining the students’ conceptual understanding of biotechnology and can also be used as an alternative for evaluating student learning outcomes.
- Copyright
- © 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
- Open Access
- This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Cite this article
TY - CONF AU - Rukayah AU - Idam Ragil Widianto Atmojo AU - Hartono AU - Joko Daryanto PY - 2020 DA - 2020/02/05 TI - Conceptual Biotechnology Measured by Using a Two-Tier Multiple Test BT - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education (ICLIQE 2019) PB - Atlantis Press SP - 565 EP - 569 SN - 2352-5398 UR - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200129.069 DO - 10.2991/assehr.k.200129.069 ID - 2020 ER -