Special Elements for Death Penalty Judgement Reasoning from the Perspective of Legal Dogmatics

DOI

10.2991/icmess-18.2018.121How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Legal dogmatics; Referee documents; Reasoning elements; Death penalty cases

Abstract

When out of regulation of legal dogmatics, much reasoning trial for death penalty often encounters a lot of realistic difficulties, which only takes a great amount of judicial and social costs but also causes litigation-related complaints easily so as to affect comprehensive social governance. This paper finds that, by means of judicial case studies and public interviews on streets, all sectors of society have high expectations for elements and degrees of judgement reasoning on issues involving conviction or not and immediate execution of death penalty or not. Therefore, the paper argues that, in death penalty cases, it is necessary to intensify reasoning for conviction, no punishment in doubtful cases, the unknown body and tool for criminal purpose in homicide cases, unknown sources and whereabouts of drugs with consideration of special elements for conviction and sentencing.

Copyright

© 2018, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Xiaozheng Lei
PY  - 2018/06
DA  - 2018/06
TI  - Special Elements for Death Penalty Judgement Reasoning from the Perspective of Legal Dogmatics
BT  - Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Management, Education and Social Science (ICMESS 2018)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 550
EP  - 553
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/icmess-18.2018.121
DO  - 10.2991/icmess-18.2018.121
ID  - Lei2018/06
ER  -