Limits to applicability of types of rationality in legal activities
- 10.2991/ismge-19.2019.31How to use a DOI?
- types of rationality, judge, lawyer, legislator, legal thinking, levels of legal knowledge
The article attempts to establish the limits of applicability for distinguishing between types of rationality in legal activity on the basis of philosophical criteria. The authors revealed differences in thinking of a legal official, judge and, legislator, due to the peculiarities of their professional activities. Based on V. Stepina's classification of rationality types, the authors of the article try to prove that various specialties in the legal profession respectively require their representatives thinking at the level of classical, non-classical and post-non-classical rationality. Recognition of this distinction will allow substantiating the approaches to training lawyers, as well as explaining different views on the concept of law.
- © 2019, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.
- Open Access
- This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Cite this article
TY - CONF AU - Marina Davydova AU - Dmitry Zykov PY - 2019/07 DA - 2019/07 TI - Limits to applicability of types of rationality in legal activities BT - Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific Practical Conference "The Individual and Society in the Modern Geopolitical Environment" (ISMGE 2019) PB - Atlantis Press SP - 156 EP - 161 SN - 2352-5398 UR - https://doi.org/10.2991/ismge-19.2019.31 DO - 10.2991/ismge-19.2019.31 ID - Davydova2019/07 ER -