Comparative experimental study of the effect of different recovery methods on the recovery of sEMG after muscle fatigue

DOI

10.2991/mseee-17.2017.85How to use a DOI?

Keywords

MVC; sEMG; musle power; vibration recovery; cryotherapy.

Abstract

This paper's purpose is to investigate the effect of passive recovery (PR), active recovery (AR), vibration recovery (VR) and cryotherapy recovery (CR) on muscle sEMG after muscle fatigue. 20 healthy male college students were enrolled in the study. sEMG of MVC(Maximum Voluntary Contraction) and MP(Muscle Power) of the biceps brachii of the non-handedness were measured. The differences and recovery effects of sEMG at different detection time points were tested by one-way repeated measures ANOVA. Results shows that sEMG of MVC and MP, VR and PR have obvious effect for recovery after fatigue and VR has more obvious recovery effect compared with AR.

Copyright

© 2017, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Fan Zhang
PY  - 2017/08
DA  - 2017/08
TI  - Comparative experimental study of the effect of different recovery methods on the recovery of sEMG after muscle fatigue
BT  - Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Material Science, Energy and Environmental Engineering (MSEEE 2017)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 463
EP  - 466
SN  - 2352-5401
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/mseee-17.2017.85
DO  - 10.2991/mseee-17.2017.85
ID  - Zhang2017/08
ER  -