Evaluation of Flood and Landslide Management Program in Manado City

DOI

10.2991/978-2-494069-35-0_198How to use a DOI?

Keywords

evaluation of flood; landslide management

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the Flood and Landslides Management Program in Manado City using a qualitative approach and data collection techniques through observation of areas affected by floods and landslides, semi-structured interviews with community leaders in areas affected by floods and landslides, program stakeholders, and documents in the form of programs on a macro scale, mezzo and micro. The results showed that: Manado City was classified as sloping plains with a slope of 0–8%; choppy classification with a slope of 8–15%; Classification of hilly waves with a slope of 15–40%; and classification mountainous with a slope of > 40%, has a topography that is dominated by sloping plains 78.51 percent, undulating land, 14.27 percent, undulating hilly plains 7.20 percent and 0.02 percent mountainous. The average rainfall ranged from 10 mm to 544 mm, and 33 villages were affected by floods and landslides. On a macro level, the Disaster Management program is regulated through Law no. 24 of 2007 and its implementation at the meso and micro levels by the National Regional Disaster Management Agency. The results showed that a). Regional BBDs have not continuously conducted socialization in areas prone to erosions and floods. b). Formation of Disaster Resilient Families Facilitators The Disaster Resilient Families have not worked seriously on an ongoing basis, c). The establishment of Disaster Preparedness Units/Pos for Disaster Hazard Map has not been communicated intensively, d). The establishment of Disaster Resilient Villages has not been prioritized for villages that are prone to flooding and erosions. e). Improvement of Human Resources through training and simulations is not yet community-based by taking into account the diversity of targets, f). Structural and intensive sustainable coordination has not been implemented with urban villages, religious social organizations, stakeholders, universities, and the private sector. For that it is recommended: a). Regional BPB continuously conducts socialization in areas prone to erosions and floods. b). Formation of Disaster Resilient Families Facilitators Disaster Resilient Families Work seriously on an ongoing basis, c). Establishment of Disaster Preparedness Units/Pos for Disaster Hazard Map is communicated intensively, d). The establishment of a Disaster-Resilient Urban Village is prioritized for villages that are prone to flooding and erosions. e). Improvement of Human Resources through community-based training and simulations by taking into account the diversity of targets, f). Structural and intensive continuous coordination, religious social organizations, stakeholders, universities and the private sector needs to be carried out effectively.

Copyright

© 2023 The Author(s)

Open Access

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Jeane E. Langkai
AU  - Itje Pangkey
PY  - 2023
DA  - 2023/01/17
TI  - Evaluation of Flood and Landslide Management Program in Manado City
BT  - Proceedings of the Unima International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (UNICSSH 2022)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 1676
EP  - 1682
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-35-0_198
DO  - 10.2991/978-2-494069-35-0_198
ID  - Langkai2023
ER  -