Regulatory Discourse on Woman’s Body
The Case of Muhammadiyah and Salafi’s Clerics Preaching
Eva Leiliyanti, Dhaurana Atikah Dewi, Zufrufin Saputra, Andera Wiyakintra, Muhammad Ulul Albab
Available Online 17 December 2020.
- https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201215.035How to use a DOI?
- Appraisal, cleric, patriarchal language, preaching, regulatory discourse, transitivity system
- This discourse analysis aims to compare and evaluate the patriarchal language on woman’s body represented by the preaching of Muhammadiyah and Salafi’s clerics. Both have positioned the woman’s body as a regulatory discourse that must be controlled by men. The data, which included 15 minutes and 5 minutes of transcripts of the respective clerics’ preaching, were taken from Youtube by employing stratified purposive sampling. Deploying transitivity system by Halliday and three interacting domains of Appraisal, evaluation language theory, postulated by Martin and White, this study found that each cleric approached this discourse in discrepant linguistic manners. From the language of Muhammadiyah’s cleric, it was found that the cleric delineated this discourse based on the segregation of the dubious religious correct and incorrect propriety for the women, different from Salafi’s cleric, the plausible religious normality. Both clerics’ languages were dominated by relational processes alongside negative judgements within intensified heteroglossic utterances.
- Open Access
- This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.
Cite this article
TY - CONF AU - Eva Leiliyanti AU - Dhaurana Atikah Dewi AU - Zufrufin Saputra AU - Andera Wiyakintra AU - Muhammad Ulul Albab PY - 2020 DA - 2020/12/17 TI - Regulatory Discourse on Woman’s Body BT - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2020) PB - Atlantis Press SP - 228 EP - 234 SN - 2352-5398 UR - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201215.035 DO - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201215.035 ID - Leiliyanti2020 ER -