The Allocation Research about the Policy Functions and Economic Functions of China’s Electricity Regulation
Available Online July 2018.
- https://doi.org/10.2991/iserss-18.2018.15How to use a DOI?
- the electricity regulation, the power allocation, checks and balance, the separation of government and supervising
- Macropolicy regulation and microeconomic regulation of electricity regulatory power are disparate types of powers in legal principles. The former has the property of quasi-legislative power but the latter has the property of both executive power and quasi-judicial power, which determine that it is supposed to allocate the above-mentioned different powers to different regulators according to the principle of checks and balance. After state electricity regulatory commission (serc) was established, the allocation structure that the administration is separated from supervising decentralized out of place when allocating the core economy regulatory power like electricity pricing to policy regulators, which didn’t achieve the checks and balances; it radically abandons the allocation principles to repeal the current allocation structure of serc and allocate these two regulatory powers to the same regulator. Only relocating the policy and economy functions of electricity regulation in the light of independent regulation and energy regulation’s patterns can it establish a basis to make china get rid of the trouble that the electricity regulation is invalid.
- Open Access
- This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license.
Cite this article
TY - CONF AU - Qiong Wei PY - 2018/07 DA - 2018/07 TI - The Allocation Research about the Policy Functions and Economic Functions of China’s Electricity Regulation BT - Proceedings of the 2018 International Seminar on Education Research and Social Science (ISERSS 2018) PB - Atlantis Press SP - 52 EP - 57 SN - 2352-5398 UR - https://doi.org/10.2991/iserss-18.2018.15 DO - https://doi.org/10.2991/iserss-18.2018.15 ID - Wei2018/07 ER -