Reform Against Criminal Corruption

DOI

10.2991/assehr.k.200529.298How to use a DOI?

Keywords

reformulation, crime, corruption, absorption, finance, state

Abstract

In the development of law enforcement in Indonesia recently that massive against corruption began the results. However, in the past few years the total absorption of budget revenue and expenditure and areas in Indonesia is far from optimal, many obstacles to the absorption of the budget should certainly be able to be overcome by the government, it can decreased left forecast for economic growth. One is considered a bottleneck in the budget absorption it is the fear of the stakeholders at the regional and central levels in running projects that have been planned, the fears is because the officials of power holders are afraid to take that step would later in connection with the acts of corruption. The purpose of this thesis, namely; First, to determine the causes of delays in development projects in relation to Article 3 Constitution No. 31 of 1999 Jo Constitution No. 20 of 2001 on Corruption Eradication, Second, to find out ideally Article 3 Constitution No. 31 of 1999 Jo Constitution No. 20 of 2001 on Corruption Eradication if it is associated with impaired development projects. The method used in this research is a kind of normative juridical research. From the research, based on two formulation of the problem can be inferred. First, the cause of inhibition of development projects in relation to Article 3 Constitution No. 31 of 1999 Jo Constitution No. 20 of 2001 on Corruption Eradication is, the reluctance of the state apparatus that has an important role in accelerating the development program to implement or make policy and discretion in order to accelerate the development process. This arises because the number of policy and discretion made by aparatu countries brought into the realm of criminal law corruption that led to criminal penalties. Second, ideally Article 3 Constitution No. 31 of 1999 Jo Constitution No. 20 of 2001 on Corruption Eradication if it is associated with impaired development projects is, in its application to prioritize administrative process if the state is doing an offense in terms of making a policy, making it clear which is the criminal corrupt administration and which is an administrative violation.

Copyright

© 2020, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press.

Open Access

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Tengku Arif Hidayat
PY  - 2020
DA  - 2020/05/29
TI  - Reform Against Criminal Corruption
BT  - Proceedings of the Riau Annual Meeting on Law and Social Sciences (RAMLAS 2019)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 186
EP  - 189
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200529.298
DO  - 10.2991/assehr.k.200529.298
ID  - Hidayat2020
ER  -